Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT40\/Rotoflex$\!\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*GT40\/Rotoflex$\!\?$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: GT40/Rotoflex(!?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:15:44 EST5EDT; I was watching Speedvision last night (baby's favorite channel) and there was a program about the birth and development of the Ford GT40. One of the closeups of the engine/transmission combination re; /html/triumphs/1999-01/msg01276.html (7,213 bytes)
2. Re: GT40/Rotoflex(!?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 08:47:52 -0600charset="iso-8859-1"; FYI on the rotoflex couplings, they were also used in Formula 1 cars (especially Lotus) from the very early '60's. Eventually, CV joints replaced them in this and other racing applications. I suspect; /html/triumphs/1999-01/msg01281.html (8,007 bytes)
3. Re: GT40/Rotoflex(!?) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 07:32:52 -0800; ** You may be correct, but all I know is that I used the same "replacements, (QH)" on all my cars. The ones in the GT6+ are still in there after eight years and several thousands of miles, with no s; /html/triumphs/1999-01/msg01291.html (7,794 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]