Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Apology\s+$was\s+\:\s+AutoX\s+and\s+what\'s\s+stock$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Apology\s+$was\s+\:\s+AutoX\s+and\s+what\'s\s+stock$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Apology (was : AutoX and what's stock) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:20:03 -0700; Thanks for the link ! I note the rules also state : "It is not up to the safety inspector to classify the car." I could probably muster an argument that rear sway bars should be allowed in stock cla; /html/triumphs/2000-08/msg00732.html (7,543 bytes)
2. Apology (was : AutoX and what's stock) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:26:08 -0400; Message text written by Randall Young Portland. (Although my wheels are stock Triumph wheels, they aren't stock TR3A wheels.) I apologize to everyone concerned. I can only plead ignorance, and failin; /html/triumphs/2000-08/msg00741.html (7,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]