Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Rear\s+Springs\;\s+Ride\s+Height\s+TR4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Rear\s+Springs\;\s+Ride\s+Height\s+TR4\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TR] Rear Springs; Ride Height TR4 (score: 1): Author: Jeffrey Barteet <barteet@mrl.ucsb.edu>; Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:28:36 -0800; My '62 TR4 with the original springs sat pretty high in back too. Reminded me of a postal jeep. I think the problem is that the car was fitted with springs to carry 2x 175 lb. passengers and 75-100; /html/triumphs/2007-12/msg00034.html (8,596 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] Rear Springs; Ride Height TR4 (score: 1): Author: tom white <tswhitez123@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:33:38 +0000; I need to raise the ride height of my TR3A about an inch. Will TR4 rear springs fir the TR3A? Best regards, Tom _________________________________________________________________ You keep typing, we k; /html/triumphs/2007-12/msg00038.html (8,191 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] Rear Springs; Ride Height TR4 (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 07:52:15 -0800; Should fit, since early TR4 used the same springs as TR2-3A, and I don't believe there was any frame change when the springs changed to the arched type. Haven't tried it myself yet, though. Of cours; /html/triumphs/2007-12/msg00039.html (7,344 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]