Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+FW\:\s+Early\s+TR4\s+\-\s+Front\s+Brakes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+FW\:\s+Early\s+TR4\s+\-\s+Front\s+Brakes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] FW: Early TR4 - Front Brakes (score: 1): Author: lbc.resto@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:51:22 +0000; I now have one of the front brake calipers apart. I know that you're not supposed to split them, but that is the only way that the pistons were going to come out after decades of nil use. Also, I am; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00710.html (7,539 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] FW: Early TR4 - Front Brakes (score: 1): Author: acekraut11@aol.com; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:59:59 -0400; I have split, cleaned, painted, installed new stainless pistons and seals on the TR6 with not problems. I would encourage the stainless and I bought mine from TRF. Brakes work great with no leaks. N; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00711.html (8,625 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] FW: Early TR4 - Front Brakes (score: 1): Author: Geo & Kathleen Hahn <ahwahnee@cybertrails.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 11:05:02 -0700; Some have, not me. IMO, stainless is the only way to go. As I recall Moss used to offer both the chrome & stainless. Geo H == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00713.html (7,455 bytes)
4. RE: [TR] FW: Early TR4 - Front Brakes (score: 1): Author: "rgt2" <rgt2@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:08:29 -0700; I have past e-mail showing the torque on the 5/16" bolts is 45 ft/lbs and for the 3/8" bolts it is 75 ft/lbs. I used these figures when I rebuilt my calipers and have had no issues at all with them.; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00719.html (8,448 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]