Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+1\s+Question\s+and\s+pics\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+1\s+Question\s+and\s+pics\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] 1 Question and pics... (score: 1): Author: "Beaudoin, Jonathan" <beaudoin.jonathan@ville.gatineau.qc.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:03:12 -0400; Good morning to all list members Last week I was seeking info on my mystery spit distributor. After checking everything I maid my mind to remove the Lucas 25D4 dist that was installed by the DPO. Sin; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00307.html (7,383 bytes)
2. RE: [TR] 1 Question and pics... (score: 1): Author: "Beaudoin, Jonathan" <beaudoin.jonathan@ville.gatineau.qc.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:21:21 -0400; Thanks Barry, I already have an electronic tach and my 25D4 does not have tach drive... Do you think it's better to have a pertronix or a crane conversion on my 25D or to go with the 45DE4? Jonathan; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00313.html (7,727 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] 1 Question and pics... (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:36:11 -0700; Having used both of those products, I prefer hands down the Pertronix, for a couple of reasons. 1. It is a drop in installation that just replaces the points. No modifications are required. 2. If it; /html/triumphs/2006-09/msg00314.html (7,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]