Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"Decking\"\s+wet\s+sleeve\s+block\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. "Decking" wet sleeve block (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:52:37 -0400
Hello List: Have a question on decking or truing a TR2-4 wet sleeve block. Given the design of the wet sleeve engine, is it still a good idea to have the block to head mating surfaces machined true?
/html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00864.html (6,932 bytes)

2. RE: "Decking" wet sleeve block (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:06:11 -0700
Machining the head is easy. Doing either the block or the liners is much trickier to get right, I wouldn't do it unless there's a clear need. It's very rare for a liner to warp, and if one did, I'd
/html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00866.html (7,514 bytes)

3. RE: "Decking" wet sleeve block (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:19:42 -0700
Bob, I either don't understand you, or I don't agree. The .003" to .005" protrusion is important, without it the head gasket will likely leak compression. BTDT. I'm personally not a believer in dipp
/html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00914.html (7,247 bytes)

4. RE: "Decking" wet sleeve block (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:33:48 -0700
Possibly all true, I haven't tried it. But with the liners removed, the scale and water jacket deposits can be easily removed with a wire brush, which IMO is a lot easier than having to load and tra
/html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00955.html (7,160 bytes)

5. RE: "Decking" wet sleeve block (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:11:12 -0700
No argument there ... but with the sleeves removed you can easily access all the passages to mechanically clean them. You can literally see through the rear drain ! BTW, my block is closer to 50 yea
/html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00978.html (7,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu