- 1. Why we own Tigers with rod length and oil additives (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 19:11:16 -0700
- Apparently one of the main reasons we own Tigers with insanely souped-up engines is to SCARE OURSELVES; to wit, these and other similar recent posts. Art over 306 computer get my Also, Bob Hokanson
- /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00038.html (12,313 bytes)
- 2. Re: Why we own Tigers with rod length and oil additives (score: 1)
- Author: DrMayf@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 11:13:22 EDT
- Yeah, right on brother. As to the aerodynamics, you are absolutely right. The rolled front valence pan just wedges air under the car and then, Houston, we have lift off! But, I will have a full front
- /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00076.html (7,328 bytes)
- 3. Re: Why we own Tigers with rod length and oil additives (score: 1)
- Author: DrMayf@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 14:46:48 EDT
- Very curious, especially concerning the all to recent and continuing arguments for names of Alpines with Ford V8s. I do not believe in any instance I ever tried to palm my V8 powered Alpine of as a T
- /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00084.html (7,550 bytes)
- 4. Re: Why we own Tigers with rod length and oil additives (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 12:30:07 -0700
- DrMayf, et Listers, Are we having a bad day or are you just pulling my chain? First, did anyone raise an objection to you using an Alpine chassis? Certainly wasn't me. Actually didn't know and don't
- /html/tigers/1998-10/msg00090.html (8,656 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu