Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Turning\s+radius\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Turning\s+radius\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Turning radius (score: 1): Author: "James Pickard" <geowiz@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 20:15:50 -0600; Is it my imagination, or is the turning radius on a Tiger greater than that of the Alpine of my youth? Or is the radius limited by the size of the tires? Anybody have the specs on the respective turn; /html/tigers/1997-12/msg00133.html (6,900 bytes)
2. Re: Turning radius (score: 1): Author: "Doug & Rett Leithauser" <dleit@mintcity.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 09:26:46 -0500; I don't have specs, but your right, tigers do not like sharp turns. The radius is large and the tires scrub. I think sharp turns are supposed to be made with the rear end powersliding. Kinda awkward; /html/tigers/1997-12/msg00135.html (7,503 bytes)
3. Re: Turning radius (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 10:44:32 +0000; Turning radius of Tiger is larger than similarly sized cars. Suspect limits intentional, becasue of poor Ackerman angle, to provide load protection to the suspension system. Steve -- Steve Laifman <; /html/tigers/1997-12/msg00136.html (7,303 bytes)
4. Re: Turning radius (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 09:56:20; Steve, et al., Your suppositions assume there was some kind of "engineering" going on at Rootes/Sunbeam, regarding the Tiger. On this point I'm afraid I'm skeptical. The large turning radius is the r; /html/tigers/1997-12/msg00149.html (8,233 bytes)
5. Re: Turning radius (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 10:28:37 +0000; BOB, You've tried this yourself? Is it really do-able? Can the rack be moved back 3/4 inch without hitting something wlse? Do the MG arms just "bolt" in place, or is a "hot wrench" and a come-along r; /html/tigers/1997-12/msg00154.html (8,159 bytes)
6. Re: Turning radius (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 17:20:50; This is the setup I've had on my car for the past four years. I'm also using one of the early quick ratio racks which mates nicely with the MGB arms which, because of their length, tend to increase; /html/tigers/1997-12/msg00163.html (10,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]