Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Performance\s+Tuning\s+the\s+Tiger\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: "Ronak, TP (Timothy)" <Timothy.P.Ronak@akzo-nobel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:15:23 -0600
Theo pointed out that I did not answer the question!!! Figures he would zing me on that. To do the calculation give me the bore size of you engine, the stroke and the piston configuration, we can ma
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00452.html (20,290 bytes)

22. Re: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Tom Hall <modtiger@engravers.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:17:20 -0600
9.4375:1 Tom
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00453.html (8,927 bytes)

23. Re: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:15:50 +0000
Assuming your numbers are accurate: 54 cc. x 11 = 594 original volume 594 / 64 = 9.28:1 Compression Ratio = Final Volume / Swept Volume I've assumed that the deck height and gasket thickness were con
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00455.html (9,498 bytes)

24. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: "Ronak, TP (Timothy)" <Timothy.P.Ronak@akzo-nobel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:27:11 -0600
Steve had the piece I could not come up with. OK Steve I get to "correct you" 'cause you forgot to add the extra chamber volume to the original swept volume as the 594 original CC volume is right un
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00456.html (11,160 bytes)

25. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Theo Smit <TSMIT@isotel.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:49:50 -0700
Let's see... Assume it's a 302 with 11:1 compression. That makes the chamber volume, including all domes, head gaskets, valves, spark plugs, etc. ( 302 / (11-1) ) / 8 = 3.775 cid = 61.86 cc So going
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00457.html (10,760 bytes)

26. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 06:24:15 -0800
I'm surprised no one has questioned your formula. It raises the question of what is really the definition of compression ratio. Of course, you can't fool Mother Nature, and with her in mind I would
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00466.html (13,182 bytes)

27. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 06:58:03 -0800
OK, I've had my cup of coffee now. As usual, you're right. Bob Robert L. Palmer UCSD, Dept. of AMES 619-822-1037 (o) 760-599-9927 (h) rpalmer@ucsd.edu rpalmer@cts.com
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00467.html (8,179 bytes)

28. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 10:34:15 -0800
The Washington Post's "Style Invitational" asked readers to take any word from the dictionary, alter it by adding, subtracting or changing one letter, and supply a new definition. There were a lot o
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00474.html (8,729 bytes)

29. Re: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@Flash.Net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:26:45 +0000
With all do respect to the great reference material given by Bob (right into my Bookmarks), there are easier to read explanations, but no less correct. And the correct solution to the given problem.
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00479.html (11,432 bytes)

30. Re: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:10:28 -0800 (PST)
I could be wrong but I think here's where the 54cc chamber comes from: chamber volume Part Number Engine year min max C30Z-6049-AF 260cuin All 52 55 C3AZ-6049-AF 289 63/65 52 55 C50Z-6049-B 289 HP 63
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00497.html (13,488 bytes)

31. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: "Ronak, TP (Timothy)" <Timothy.P.Ronak@akzo-nobel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:16:04 -0600
OK Bore on a 289 = 4.0 + .060 = 4.060 Stroke on a 289 = 2.87" or 73mm or 7.3 cm =(4.060/2) squared X pi X 2.87"=swept volume in metric (10.3124cm/2)squared X (22/7) X 7.2898cm =swept volume 609.0684
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00515.html (24,496 bytes)

32. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: "Ronak, TP (Timothy)" <Timothy.P.Ronak@akzo-nobel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:11:46 -0600
Based on the calculation the net dome volume (Dome volume - Valve relief if in fact TRW calculated it right then the Dome volume is 3.658cc. When you run it through the numbers if in fact the dart h
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00529.html (29,751 bytes)

33. RE: Performance Tuning the Tiger (score: 1)
Author: Theo Smit <TSMIT@isotel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:25:32 -0700
Gee, Tim, thanks for your concern, but it's been nice enough the last couple of days that the ice on the garage floor melted so my starter adventure yesterday wasn't all that bad. I sincerely hope it
/html/tigers/2000-01/msg00530.html (8,469 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu