Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fraud\?\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 22:44:30 -0700
I did not say TAC. I did not mean TAC. I'm sorry I said "certified". You'll have to trust me on this one, or not, as you choose. The value here may be that this provoked a further examination of the
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00486.html (9,165 bytes)

22. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: "JAN HARDE" <harde@cyberesc.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 22:40:48 -0700
Hmmmmm, let me see--we authenticate cars....for what purpose....to know which ones are not real??? and if we know the ones that are not?? should people not know ?? every other club does!!! Ahhhhhh D
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00487.html (9,817 bytes)

23. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: "JAN HARDE" <harde@cyberesc.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 23:01:35 -0700
You got em' going now, fur and body parts will be flying soon.. Both of us will be Blacklisted soon, modern day McCarthy'ism.. Naahh they will get over it. Or better yet they may listen...after all
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00489.html (13,253 bytes)

24. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 23:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Hey dweeb, I don't appreciate your sarcasim. Get the hell of my back. I don't disagree. I was just suprised that I thought I read about a change in policy. You jump everybody? Regards, Jim --JAN HARD
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00490.html (10,594 bytes)

25. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 23:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks, I've been wrestling with the TAC issue for my car and I was a bit uncomfortable if there had been a change. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Regards, Jim B9470139 --Bob Palmer <rpalmer@am
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00491.html (9,703 bytes)

26. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: "JAN HARDE" <harde@cyberesc.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 23:22:59 -0700
Now that is not very nice, especially since I made no personal attack on you, and my name is still Jan. And You have a GREAT week as well.. My skin is rather thick.. but I did not mean to offend you
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00492.html (11,853 bytes)

27. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: HW200@aol.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 03:22:55 EDT
<< Henry, Is this the best you can do?? Don't shoot the messenger here. Norm just posted this on his Web page a few months ago and now passed on to the list the latest chapter for this car. I underst
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00493.html (8,916 bytes)

28. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 08:52:20 -0700
Well, someone let the cat out of the bag. I was busily writing a rebuttal to Jim, about his comments to Bob. I was pointing out that Bob never said "TAC" certifier's, and that this was an L.A. car, a
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00498.html (10,370 bytes)

29. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 09:56:53 -0700
Henry, et Listers, Well, Henry, there's been a lot of water under the bridge since your posting and had I known then what I know now, I might have responded a little bit differently. On the specific
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00500.html (10,944 bytes)

30. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: PLRRESTO@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 15:55:26 EDT
Man! Oh man! Take off for a few hours, come back and look at all this. All in one sitting, I'm everything from a godsend to an arrogant asshole. Actually, I figure I'm something in between. So where
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00541.html (14,650 bytes)

31. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 15:27:29 -0700
Paul, et Listers, I seems like the more I beat the bushes on this topic, the more surprises jump out. Maybe if we keep this up we'll finally get the whole story some day. (I'm sure there must still b
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00547.html (18,344 bytes)

32. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: HW200@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 18:09:47 EDT
<< Anybody who has Tiger owners as friends can't be that bad. It would seem, however, since you don't own a Tiger, that you must just enjoy stirring up controversy >> Once again Bob- you are misinfor
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00568.html (8,112 bytes)

33. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: HW200@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 18:12:23 EDT
<< I actually prefer you old style of swaggering down the middle of the street with both guns blazing to this new sniping behind the guise of innocence crap. Bob >> Oh by the way -I'll see if I can't
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00569.html (7,657 bytes)

34. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 10:53:01 -0700
until Damn!! Once again it looks like I'm misinformed on a very crucial point. I hate it when I do this. Thanks for the correction. I'm trying to remember just how I got the idea that you didn't own
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00639.html (9,882 bytes)

35. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: tiger technologies <tartanad@ix11.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:27:30 -0700
piece of kaka Tiger conversion. And everything Jan reported I back up in spades. The guy who purchased that car at auction--or the auctioneer who HAD to know it was a fake should be hung from their
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00703.html (11,527 bytes)

36. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Ya tricked me. I read this message as addresed to me and I thought we were having a 1-on-1 conversation. Now you post it to the group. That's TACie and I'm not playing that game. REgards, Jim B947013
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00706.html (7,337 bytes)

37. Re: Fraud? (score: 1)
Author: rootes1@best.com (Norman Miller)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 16:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
Can anyone confirm the rumor that Jim Wallace is back in business?
/html/tigers/1998-08/msg00707.html (6,997 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu