Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+Removal\s+Clearance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+Removal\s+Clearance\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Engine Removal Clearance (score: 1): Author: mbb <2mbb@concentric.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 11:03:56 -0800; I'm pulling the 302/top loader on my MK1 in a week or so. My exhaust has an H-style cross over located a few inches in front of the transmission mount. Does anyone know if I can pull the engine as i; /html/tigers/2000-02/msg00148.html (6,802 bytes)
2. Re: Engine Removal Clearance (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:14:48 EST; << I'm pulling the 302/top loader on my MK1 in a week or so. My exhaust has an H-style cross over located a few inches in front of the transmission mount. Does anyone know if I can pull the engine as; /html/tigers/2000-02/msg00151.html (7,819 bytes)
3. Re: Engine Removal Clearance (score: 1): Author: James Barrett <jamesbrt@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:53:12 -0500; I vote for removal. The motor/transmission has to tilt up (tail shaft down) a lot to get the motor out. This is assuming that you do not plan to cut the sheet metal in frount of the radiator for mor; /html/tigers/2000-02/msg00154.html (7,337 bytes)
4. Re: Engine Removal Clearance (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 17:19:29 -0500; Mark, I think you will find that the engine out the bottom is easier. Just put my 5.0L with T-5 in and I can't imagine doing it from the top. If your exhaust is good, why not cut the H-Pipe close to; /html/tigers/2000-02/msg00163.html (6,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]