Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Apocryphal\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Apocryphal\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Apocryphal? (score: 1): Author: "Edmund E. Powell" <102430.3640@CompuServe.COM>; Date: 14 Jul 96 15:22:09 EDT; Victoria British Ltd., in their 1996 summer edition Sunbeam parts catalog, claims "the persistent rumor of late 1966 Tigers supplied with 289 CID engines from the 'factory' is simply not supported by; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00187.html (8,004 bytes)
2. Re: Apocryphal? (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 96 10:32:13 PST; -I am supposedly the 3rd owner of our TIGER. The PO had it for about 10 years, as far as he knew it had the "original" 5-bolt engine. When he rebuilt it, the shop realized it was a 289...not a 260.; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00220.html (8,748 bytes)
3. Re[2]: Apocryphal? (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 96 09:19:24 PST; -Anybody that has any mfg. experience at all, knows how difficult & time-consuming it is to hit a break-point right on the ol' kazoo. -I've NEVER, NEVER worked anywhere where this was done to the fo; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00265.html (9,436 bytes)
4. Re[4]: Apocryphal? (score: 1): Author: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com; Date: Thu, 25 Jul 96 12:09:36 PST; -What's scary about this whole thing is, unless you have the actual work-orders to match to the Production Plan/Records(in my example, the "official" changeover on the 260 badge was car # 2400)you'l; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00274.html (8,645 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]