Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+transmissions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+transmissions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] transmissions (score: 1): Author: "Russ and Tammy C." <rtscolgan@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:17:06 -0800 (PST); I am going to run a ford motor sport 345 horse in my 65........would I still be happy with the close ratio transmission or should I change it to wide ratio? Street use only. Anybody have thoughts? Th; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00276.html (7,036 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] transmissions (score: 1): Author: Carmods@aol.com; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:26:31 EST; would I still be happy with the close ratio transmission or should I change it to wide ratio? Russ, I recommend you go with a wide ratio transmission and the 2.88 rear end, unless you are going to do; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00277.html (6,670 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] transmissions (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:28:10 -0800; I agree with John Logan. I have the "wide" (not) ratio transmission and the original 2.88 rear end. Very satisfying on street or highway, and the Salisbury version of the LAT-34 Dana. Salisbury is o; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00278.html (8,299 bytes)
4. Re: [Tigers] transmissions (score: 1): Author: Sandy Ganz <sganz@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:38:28 -0800 (PST); If your on a PC check out this one, it is very good at helping visualizing gear changes, and a nice easy to use interface. It does not have the Top Loader ratios built in, but it saves you last run s; /html/tigers/2008-01/msg00279.html (9,119 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]