- 1. [Tigers] Standard vs. GT Interior (score: 1)
- Author: Rollright@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:24:59 -0400 (EDT)
- Hello, I want to admit making a very expensive mistake, and in doing so, help others avoid this thoughtless error. My intention was to re-chrome the chrome-plated pot-metal 'finishers' just below the
- /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00079.html (11,349 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Standard vs. GT Interior (score: 1)
- Author: "Scattt" <scattt@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:24:07 -0400
- Jim: All the Tigers with the non Gt interiors use the same smaller finishers. -- Original Message -- From: <Rollright@aol.com> To: <tigers@Autox.Team.Net> Cc: <onegonefish@comcast.net>; <todbrown@roa
- /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00080.html (12,556 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Standard vs. GT Interior (score: 1)
- Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:36:14 +1000
- Jim, While i will say thanks for the warning.. not all Tigers used the wider/deeper GT style !/4 window finshers. The early tigers, round bonnet/door/boot cars used the ST smaller alpine ST style fin
- /html/tigers/2012-04/msg00081.html (13,538 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu