Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Original\s+engine\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Original\s+engine\?\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: Marc James Small <marcsmall@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 20:39:31 -0400; EVERY serial number is of vital utility to someone if the provenance is provided. I am quite active in the history of optics and photography, and we always beg, scream, cry, and yell for every possib; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00216.html (9,276 bytes)
22. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: <sralsten@ca.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:56:51 -0400; OK Ron you and Marc talked me into checking for my numbers. I don't recall what the subject line was on the request you sent out so please send again. Steve R B9473720 _______________________________; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00217.html (11,960 bytes)
23. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:17:46 -0400; Here is the original request for information I sent out for the engine study I started. It originated after several requests about what color should the B19KC engine be painted were sent out. TBON l; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00221.html (10,189 bytes)
24. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: "Samouce's" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:07:07 -0500; I just replaced what I believe to be the original water pump. Now that is Numbers on it are - C5AE-8505-C I will have it rebuilt and put it on the shelf. Duke B382002037 Steve Here is the original re; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00237.html (11,051 bytes)
25. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:43:56 -0400; There should be a date code near the casting number. It will be a year number with raised dots in a circle. I believe your original pump would have a 65 number. Definitely rebuild it. Ron Fraser I j; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00239.html (8,542 bytes)
26. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: "Samouce's" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 20:42:20 -0500; Just checked. The date code is 64. Duke Duke There should be a date code near the casting number. It will be a year number with raised dots in a circle. I believe your original pump would have a 65 n; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00240.html (8,695 bytes)
27. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 08:35:59 -0400; Interesting; this would seem to indicate that Ford stock piled the aluminum water pump to cover the 260 Tiger engine build. Numbers with history can be interesting. Ron Fraser Just checked. The date; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00242.html (8,295 bytes)
28. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: "Samouce's" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 18:01:36 -0500; It is also interesting that it is a 289 water pump. The 260 never had the addition bosses for the alternator like this one does. The part number indicated a 1965 pump but it was manufactured in 1964.; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00247.html (8,813 bytes)
29. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Dixon" <bobdixon@frii.com>; Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:25:03 -0600; My 260 seems too early for my car. The car is B382001436. The engine is: C4OE-6015E 4E11 date code 4E16F _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.ht; /html/tigers/2009-05/msg00249.html (10,773 bytes)
30. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:09:19 -0400; There were a number of design changes between 1964 and 1966 for the water pump including the cast iron water pump for the 289 in June 1965. Different boss heights were needed for the alternator and; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00054.html (8,372 bytes)
31. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:35:18 -0400; You are correct; that engine does seem too early for your Tiger. Your casting date and build date are May 1964; I would have expected 1965. This is not an impossible combination due to the way the e; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00062.html (7,661 bytes)
32. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Dixon" <bobdixon@frii.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:54:39 -0600; _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html Tigers@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers http://www.team.net/archive; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00072.html (8,400 bytes)
33. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:24:16 -0400; That number should also be on the Vin Plate. A27KA = 4/27/64 engine group 4E16F = May 16, 1964 the engine build date C40E-6015E engine block casting started production in May, 1964 4E11 = casting da; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00075.html (8,628 bytes)
34. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: kevin beck <kevinteresa.beck74@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:09:01 -0400; This is what I have C40E-6015E--4E22 99 percent sure I have the original block it was painted black. Also have a couple of questions my 260 has been sitting for quit afew years on the garage floor an; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00082.html (10,259 bytes)
35. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: "Samouce's" <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 08:06:28 -0500; My original 260 is bored .030 over. Pistons have 030 on the tops. I can relieve you of that nasty manifold. Duke B382002037 --Original Message-- From: tigers-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:tigers-bou; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00084.html (11,310 bytes)
36. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>; Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:14:44 -0400; 4E22 = May 22, 1964 I would need additional information but it should be the original block and yes it should be black. Information that would help; Vin # Engine # Build date code Engine tag numbers; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00085.html (8,511 bytes)
37. Re: [Tigers] Original engine? (score: 1): Author: "Robert J. Wanty" <rjw@wengco.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:48:16 -0400; My 260 is .040 over and runs great. Bob B382001318 --Original Message-- From: Samouce's [mailto:wsamouce@kc.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 9:06 AM To: 'kevin beck'; rfraser@bluefrog.com Cc: ti; /html/tigers/2009-06/msg00093.html (11,725 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 37
Page: [1] [2]