- 1. [Tigers] Hood louvers 2 (score: 1)
- Author: Bruce MacDougall <camelot15@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:38:40 -0400
- After reading all the responses, and going thru TE/AE & Tigers United achieves I don't think louvers is the road I want to travel. I'm not a fan of oil film coating my windshield or me. The Tiger has
- /html/tigers/2009-10/msg00050.html (8,378 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Tigers] Hood louvers 2 (score: 1)
- Author: michael king <michael.s.king@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:19:59 +1100
- Probably a really bad way of expressing what Jay did (i think its Jay) on the united site. Building a series of panels that chanels the air though the valence and gets it to the radiator. It estenti
- /html/tigers/2009-10/msg00051.html (7,638 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Tigers] Hood louvers 2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry & Maureen \(Mo\)" <JCMC2006@suddenlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:27:46 -0500
- Hi Bruce, I was one of the TAC persons who TACed your car in DC. Very nice car. I read where you were concerned about leaving your turn signal light on. Well, if you have ears like mine (I was in the
- /html/tigers/2009-10/msg00052.html (10,047 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Tigers] Hood louvers 2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Alvin Johnson" <twojohnsons@cox.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:10:06 -0400
- I had louvers for 25 years & never had any windshield film coating. I suspect that new crate 302 of yours is just as "un-leaky" as my 5-bolt 289. And louvers are certainly "retro-coooool!" Al J _____
- /html/tigers/2009-10/msg00053.html (7,427 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Tigers] Hood louvers 2 (score: 1)
- Author: Tony Somebody <achd73@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 11:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
- Bruce- it doesnt sound like your Tiger is running hot at all and with the timing advanced for better performnce, power wise, I think you have good numbers. As for the people compartment- there are se
- /html/tigers/2009-10/msg00056.html (11,342 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu