Mail Archive Search: <+from:marrone@wco.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:marrone@wco.com: 242 ]

Total 242 documents matching your query.

221. Re: Leaf spring repair/replacement (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 23:26:33 -0700 (PDT); I'm very interested to hear which after-market springs look stock, but not identical to stock!! On a related note, how easy is it to swap a Ford 9" rear into a Tiger (or an Alpine). Their big. The Da; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00271.html (7,609 bytes)
222. Re: Re[2]: Apocryphal? (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 23:26:26 -0700 (PDT); As you say it had to be! Ford did lots of it. I'm sure we could learn a lot about our cars if accurate records could be found. Frank Marrone MK I Tiger B9471116 marrone@wco.com 1966 LTD Series I Alp; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00272.html (7,405 bytes)
223. Is Eight Inches Enough? (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT); I've heard the 8" called junk but compared to what? A 9" no doubt. From what I"ve heard the Dana is definitely stronger than a 8". Is the 8" enough for a big torque and harsh treatment? I don't thin; /html/tigers/1996-07/msg00337.html (7,158 bytes)
224. Grasping for a thread/Upper grill finisher (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:44:22 -0700 (PDT); OK, didn't think it was worth it but it has been kind of quiet... My body restoration approaches conclusion and there are now lots of little nagging details to be dealt with. This is more of a story; /html/tigers/1996-06/msg00109.html (8,576 bytes)
225. More finisher questions (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 07:46:09 -0700 (PDT); I have a few more questions about the grill opening brightwork on my MKI Tiger, Can anyone tell me how the LOWER grill finisher attaches to the top of the valance? Is the lower finisher supposed to h; /html/tigers/1996-06/msg00199.html (6,953 bytes)
226. Re: Re[2]: New Thread (was REALLY, REALLY SMALL...) (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 23:57:29 -0700 (PDT); 389 V8. My info says Tempest slant 4 is 470lbs (yikes!). The word on the street is that the MGBV8 swap results in a lighter car. Figures I have show the Buick 215 at 320lbs and the Leyland 1800 at 3; /html/tigers/1996-06/msg00212.html (10,703 bytes)
227. RE: Re[2]: New Thread (was REALLY, REALLY SMALL...) (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 07:57:45 -0700 (PDT); Well, the 289 can easily be built to withstand plenty of 7000 RPM excursions and for a bit of extra coin (but not that much) you could come close to the 9000RPM you're claiming for the 215. Frank Ma; /html/tigers/1996-06/msg00238.html (9,764 bytes)
228. Re: Yawn ?? (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 20:48:14 -0700 (PDT); OK, then I get to go to 357CI with my 289, and yes that can be done with "essentially stock parts". Have you ever seen the ports and valves on a Buick or Rover 215 head? I have and I have to tell yo; /html/tigers/1996-06/msg00257.html (8,205 bytes)
229. Re: Re[4]: New Thread (was REALLY, REALLY SMALL...) (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 20:48:18 -0700 (PDT); Risky, we are talking hot rodding here right? I assure you that lots of hot rodded 289s turn post 7000 RPM without failure. BTW, the 215 is a 2-bolt main motor. What about the Boss 302 (4 inch bore,; /html/tigers/1996-06/msg00258.html (10,576 bytes)
230. Pulled Panhard (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 17:11:21 -0700 (PDT); My panhard rod bracket has ripped from the frame. I saw a repair at Toms that had the bracket welded to a thick plate of steel bolted to the frame rail. Should that plate also be welded to the frame?; /html/tigers/1996-06/msg00286.html (6,660 bytes)
231. re: Oil Cooler Trivia (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 10:07:51 -0700 (PDT); Thnaks to Tom B. and DSand95510@aol.com for the info. My Tiger B9471116 also had these mounts. There was some heavy front end damage so it is possible that the valance had been replaced. I'm surpris; /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00026.html (6,871 bytes)
232. Re: I'm baaack... (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Mon, 6 May 1996 22:56:59 -0700 (PDT); Well come on Gary, there had to be more to the trip than just another booring old drive up Hwy. 1!! Frank Marrone MK I Tiger B9471116 marrone@wco.com 1966 LTD Series I Alpine (2.3L powered by Ford); /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00035.html (6,787 bytes)
233. Re: cross frame restoration (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 22:11:15 -0700 (PDT); I've got one rear section from Rob and I thought the quality was good. I'd say that the gauge on the metal was about comparable to the ones I cut out of the Series V parts car. Frank Marrone MK I Ti; /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00099.html (7,147 bytes)
234. Re: Intakes/carb combo's (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 08:16:01 -0700 (PDT); How about the F4B? By most accounts it is a good manifold and it was used in the LAT induction kit. It was popular in the late sixties so it has correct period appeal. Their are a lot of choices and; /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00246.html (7,462 bytes)
235. Tiger Im-press-ive (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 22:42:32 -0700 (PDT); Wow, the lastest issue of the Tiger Press (Issue #4) is the best yet! Lots of great information and trivia, I sure wish I'd known about the frame rail strengthening tip before my rails we're repaired; /html/tigers/1996-05/msg00284.html (6,572 bytes)
236. Yet more body parts needed. (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 20:56:53 -0700 (PDT); As the restoration work progresses on my Tiger more and more rot is exposed. 1. I'm in need of the rear deck panel, thats the one suitable for seating small childeren or the odd third man out in a pi; /html/tigers/1996-04/msg00012.html (6,831 bytes)
237. Re: Big Question (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 07:22:43 -0700 (PDT); Do you want to make more HP? Dou you mind some loss of low RPM torque? If you answered Yes and No then larger valves may be right for you. You should consider additional porting work as well. Your c; /html/tigers/1996-04/msg00017.html (7,715 bytes)
238. Parts for sale (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:14:24 -0700 (PDT); Series V Alpine being parted out... 1725 Engine and syncro tranny complete from carbs to tailshaft. Engine runs but tired. $100 for all, delivery possible to bay area but it will cost you. Doors most; /html/tigers/1996-04/msg00151.html (6,711 bytes)
239. Rad Bulkhead Trivia (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 07:54:35 -0700 (PDT); How many different styles are there at the radiator mounting bosses on the I've got the following... 1. Series I Alpine - 1 piece bulkhead with captive nuts to fromt of bulkhead. 2. Series IV Alpine; /html/tigers/1996-04/msg00200.html (6,912 bytes)
240. Fender Trivia (score: 1): Author: marrone@wco.com (Frank Marrone); Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 07:54:43 -0700 (PDT); Are there any differences between a Series V front fender and a Series IV/MKI Tiger front fender besides the square Vs. round corner at the door edge? Frank Marrone MK I Tiger B9471116 marrone@wco.co; /html/tigers/1996-04/msg00201.html (6,404 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]