Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:djones2@mdc.com: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

21. Re: 351C installation & compare with 347 Stroker 302 (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:40:27 -0600
That would be the Performer 4V or F-351 4V (same manifold). I have one on the the 351C in the '66 Mustang for the same reasons as you - weight savings and hood clearance. The stock Ford intake is pr
/html/tigers/1999-03/msg00451.html (10,384 bytes)

22. Re: 351C installation & compare with 347 Stroker 302 -Reply (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:09:06 -0600
That grind's low on lift for the duration. The 4V heads really like more lift. The 2V''s have less ultimate flow but get the flow at lower lifts. My books show a 6.5" power valve. As light as the Ti
/html/tigers/1999-03/msg00503.html (9,923 bytes)

23. Re: 351C installation & compare with 347 Stroker 302 -Reply (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:03:50 -0600
I'll have to check. The Aussie heads are a different casting with some minor differences but I never paid much that much attention. I'll check and see what I find. Dan Jones
/html/tigers/1999-03/msg00504.html (8,612 bytes)

24. Re: 351C installation & compare with 347 Stroker 302 -Reply (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:30:12 -0600
Yup, your power valve is never opening and your main jetting is probably rich to compensate. With flat tops, closed chamber 4V's and KB pistons (and probably TRW), you should get around 10.5:1. They
/html/tigers/1999-03/msg00510.html (10,450 bytes)

25. RE: Rather have a Big One - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 15:25:19 -0600
of I have a Tremec TKO behind the 351C in my '66 Mustang. It's a he-man tranny. Also, the stock short throw shifter is lousy. It sucks to do a 7000 rpm shift from 3rd to 4th and find 2nd instead. I
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00082.html (8,326 bytes)

26. Re: Rather have a Big One (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 12:32:42 -0600
equivalent. Tremec did not produce the original top loader. Ford did. When Ford finished producing the top loader in 1974, they sold the tooling and rights to Tremec. Tremec continued to build a ver
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00196.html (9,603 bytes)

27. Re: Rather have a Big One - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 14:40:18 -0600
Yup, it looks like the cast iron SROD came out in '77 and they went to aluminum in '79. 1st gear is supposedly a weak point but probably only if you're running slicks. Dan Dan: I am running a cast ir
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00204.html (8,572 bytes)

28. Re: Rather have a Big One - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 09:44:14 -0600
Interesting. Do they produce the "aftermarket" versions of the T5 (e.g. Z-code T5) for Borg Warner? I guess Borg Warner is concentrating on the T45 5 speed and the T56 6 speed. Dan
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00219.html (7,863 bytes)

29. Re: Rather have a Big One - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 12:25:34 -0600
I'm not sure about the relative order of the top loader and the TKO. I know my road racing buddy and his transmission builder prefer the TKO over the top loader, though more gear ratios are availabl
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00225.html (8,024 bytes)

30. re: Borg Warner - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:39:55 -0600
The OEM's may be getting out of the (automatic) tranny business, as well. ZF just bought a Ford transmission plant in Ohio and plans to build continuously variable tranny's there. According to a sour
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00246.html (6,805 bytes)

31. Re: Fuel pump leaks -Reply (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 09:56:36 -0600
I guess you've never seen an SR-71 Blackbird takeoff. Leaks like a sieve. They place pans underneath while they refuel. Once it gets to supersonic cruise speeds, the whole aircraft heats up, expands,
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00480.html (7,575 bytes)

32. Long and Pointy! -Reply (score: 1)
Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 11:34:13 -0600
I just finished installing a Mallory Unilte distributor. The instructions indicated the use of a ballast resistor in addition to the stock resistor wire. Everything worked fine but with a moderately
/html/tigers/1999-02/msg00566.html (9,087 bytes)

33. Re: tiger intake - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 09:55:17 -0600
system is 50 state legal. I'm not familiar with this system. Edelbrock does market a multi-point fuel injection system for Chevy 350's but not for 5.0's AFAIK. This system is based upon a single pla
/html/tigers/1999-01/msg00346.html (7,469 bytes)

34. Intake - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:48:32 -0600
Hmmm, what did those cost? Titanium retainers are reasonable and worthwhile if you plan on spinning out the rpm. The X303 is a single pattern hydraulic roller cam, designed for EFI applications. The
/html/tigers/1999-01/msg00416.html (10,526 bytes)

35. Re: Intake (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:59:43 -0600
I dunno. I don't have a Tiger... yet. That reminds me. What sort of modifications does it take to fit an Edelbrock F-28 2x4 bbl intake to a Tiger? I've seen pictures of a Tiger with one but it looked
/html/tigers/1999-01/msg00425.html (6,769 bytes)

36. Tiger Newbie (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:36:02 -0600
Hi All, My name's Dan Jones and I'm interested in purchasing a Sunbeam Tiger. A Tiger has been on my "maybe someday when I have more garage space" list but recently I've come across a rolling Tiger c
/html/tigers/1998-12/msg00168.html (9,090 bytes)

37. Re: Tiger Newbie (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:37:40 -0600
That's a given, since it has no engine or tranny. I don't believe so. You can sell it without inspection but you can't get plates. Rules are more restrictive here. Some types of salvage titles canno
/html/tigers/1998-12/msg00172.html (8,312 bytes)

38. Tiger Newbie - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 19:24:19 -0600
I checked out the car this weekend with a friend who does bodywork. Before I get into the description of the car, let me thank everyone who replied to my post. I recieved 15 or so replies directly to
/html/tigers/1998-12/msg00197.html (12,176 bytes)

39. Re: Dan Jones' find - Reply (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 09:25:20 -0600
It *had* a narrowed 9" but that was sold off and another rear end put under car just so it would roll around. Dan I caught that but he also says it has a 9' Ford rear end. I was guessing the PO was r
/html/tigers/1998-12/msg00206.html (7,137 bytes)

40. Re: Tiger Newbie (score: 1)
Author: Dan Jones <djones2@mdc.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:15:52 -0600
The wire wheels were not part of the configuration when it was raced. They were just slapped on when the rest of the race parts were sold off. Or so says the current owner. I would guess it's an Alp
/html/tigers/1998-12/msg00212.html (7,920 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu