Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*economy\,\s+WAS\:\s+URGENT\s+FEDERAL\s+SCRAPPAGE\s+ALERT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*economy\,\s+WAS\:\s+URGENT\s+FEDERAL\s+SCRAPPAGE\s+ALERT\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. economy, WAS: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:11:31 -0600; I haven't time to make the case right now, but this sort of legislation, beyond affecting our hobby and businesses, also smacks of socio-economic engineering. There is a need, if we allow that cars a; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00056.html (7,601 bytes)
2. RE: economy, WAS: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:32:37 -0600; Seems to me this whole thing is Daschle trying to win Union votes in the auto-industry....."see, if they pass my bill, people will buy more new cars, I care about my friends in the Union, so vote dem; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00057.html (6,895 bytes)
3. Re: economy, WAS: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 12:09:21 -0500; I think (scary thought right there), they are trying to win votes amongst the hobby lobby. See, they propose something that gets our attention. They have no real intention of passing it, or know it w; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00058.html (7,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]