Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bypass\s+tube\s+on\s+head\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*bypass\s+tube\s+on\s+head\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. RE: bypass tube on head (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:57:45 -0700charset="iso-8859-1"; But when a front fan is running doesn't it then push more air through the radiator (at a faster rate then without) and then overcome any impendence/interference losses? Just a thought, -Drew in San J; /html/spridgets/2000-07/msg01694.html (9,533 bytes)
22. Re: bypass tube on head (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 20:33:06 -0400; Charles is right and as Ron Soave explained to me on fan possitions. As a pusher the air velocity through the core will all be at the tips of the blades, very little elsewhere. With a puller, it will; /html/spridgets/2000-07/msg01711.html (10,665 bytes)
23. Re: bypass tube on head (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:00:18 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"; I put a 5 inch by 20 inch grille from a Fiat across the rear of the bonnet to let the 'Fiat furnace' twin-cam cool down. As you said, the gearbox blocked off airflow so I made a new exit for the heat; /html/spridgets/2000-07/msg01722.html (9,017 bytes)
24. Re: bypass tube on head (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:24:32 +0100charset="iso-8859-1"; Aft-facing (rear mounted, downwind of the fuselage) props on aircraft are more efficient. Cessna 337 has one of each and performs better if the front engine fails than the rear one. Of course having; /html/spridgets/2000-07/msg01732.html (8,350 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]