Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+Springs\:\s+New\s+or\s+Re\-arch\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rear\s+Springs\:\s+New\s+or\s+Re\-arch\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: Richard D Arnold <richard.arnold@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 19:18:21 -0500; I seek the list's general wisdom regarding rear springs. I have a height difference side-to-side in the rear (driver's side is lower). Should I have the springs re-arched, or purchase new ones? Rich; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00832.html (7,878 bytes)
2. Re: Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: Steven Fooshee <fooshst@stumail.gc.cc.fl.us>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 17:13:43 -0500; I have a similar problem, as do most LBC's I've seen. I usually jump on the passenger door sill a few times, or take my brother to lunch :). This seems to help it for a week or two. I replaced all my; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00842.html (9,327 bytes)
3. Re: Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: Kate & Gary Bales <kgb@clipper.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 13:32:00 -0700; Think about it guys -- could it be that some drivers are too heavy for their cars? Mine rides level. Kate; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00855.html (9,842 bytes)
4. Re: Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: "Guy" <Guy@weller-lakes.freeserve.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 09:16:39 +0100; Perhaps a mass swapping of cars across the pond is called for. My UK car leans t'other way ! or .... go faster round left turns Guy -- Original Message -- From: Steven Fooshee <fooshst@stumail.gc.cc.; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00856.html (10,312 bytes)
5. Re: Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: Richard D Arnold <richard.arnold@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 00:22:49 -0500; In regard to the dreaded lean on the driver's side rear: this, Although mentioned tongue-in-cheek, I'm sure, I wonder if any one with a RHD car, or a UK lister, might be able to confirm or deny that; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00860.html (8,342 bytes)
6. Re: Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: Steven Fooshee <fooshst@stumail.gc.cc.fl.us>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 12:47:00 -0500; Ouch... Really, it's my brother's fault! Or maybe Guinness's.... (Darnit! still under 200!) -- 1987 RX-7 TII: APEXiboneztokicohoosierdaddiesgreddyeibachlowesmagnecorcone MCMLXIX Sprite: "Motor Toad"; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00867.html (10,622 bytes)
7. Re: Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 08:11:30 +1000; Hey, I resemble that remark! Mike their on This years to height I APEXiboneztokicohoosierdaddiesgreddyeibachlowesmagnecorcone; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg00882.html (10,741 bytes)
8. Re: Rear Springs: New or Re-arch? (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 10:41:16 -0700 (PDT); Kate, you may be on to something here! Mine rides level too. Ulix (150 lbs) Ulix __/__,__ ___/__|__ ..............................................(_o____o_)....<_O_____O_/... http://students.washingt; /html/spridgets/1999-07/msg01012.html (10,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]