Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Non\-hypothetical\s+question\,\s+1098\s+vs\.\s+1275\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:06:42 -0800 (PST)
Really??? With a VP3 cam and 11:1 CR? "Robert E. Shlafer" <pilotrob@webtv.net> wrote: My PO'd '74 Vizardized 1340 pulled 90+HP at the rear wheels Ron Soave "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg00625.html (9,221 bytes)

22. Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:26:54 GMT
Exactly...you make my point....the "spare" doesn't necessarily have to be on the shelf! How many of us can pull the engine in the evening, "do it" on the kitchen table for $200 and install it the nex
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg00627.html (8,662 bytes)

23. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:01:47 GMT
Yep...I used to be quite the "boy racer", Ron! I was really into this stuff. 90HP+ at the wheels. Done on Paul Newman's (D&M Engineering, Brookfield, CT) chassis dyno (boy...that was many moons ago!:
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg00628.html (9,895 bytes)

24. Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:29:44 -0500
What took so long?
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg00630.html (8,801 bytes)

25. Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:54:07 -0500
By this time, and with this list, we ALL should be able to do it. What you discribed was an "over nighter" for me, it's a couple hours ;) -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg00631.html (8,827 bytes)

26. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:03:47 -0500
This thread has gotten my thinking about a couple of project Midgets, and what changes I might make. The cars are a Mk.I, and a Mk.I 1/2. As far as suspension goes, I'm going to stick with what God a
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01409.html (9,663 bytes)

27. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:26:20 GMT
while the stock 1098 is certainly a vast improvement in terms of performance from either config. of the original 948, it cannot match the significant upper mid-range punch of the stock 1275, though
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01410.html (10,427 bytes)

28. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:12:46 GMT
Glad I could help, Bud.... far as I know, there is the early "CG" (small mains) and later "CC" (big mains) 1098. If there is a CD or other version (Spridget) I am not aware of it. The "stiffened" cra
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01418.html (9,946 bytes)

29. Re[2]: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:56:07 -0800
Hello Robert, this is the combination that i'm running... a 1098 "CC" (2 inch main bearings) with the Datsun, and a 4.22 rear end.... had the engine rebuilt stock, with the exceptions of a mild cam a
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01423.html (9,990 bytes)

30. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:04:42 -0500
Thanks again. I confess to bad memory, re the 10CD thing. It's been a long time since I've looked at either my core engines, or my Vizard book. I really should be more careful. Bud Glad I could help,
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01425.html (11,004 bytes)

31. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:04:37 GMT
LOL...not at all, Bud. Fact is, the more we know, the more difficult it becomes to remember everything accurately. When we're young, we know less!! Much easier to remember "less" than "more". :) Cap'
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01426.html (9,213 bytes)

32. Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:08:10 -0500
I run a 1275 with a 5 speed and a 4.22 diff. 80 all day is not a problem at 4500 rpm. To get to any events, I have to drive 3 hours one way (or more) So it's highways at speed for hours. I can't imag
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01445.html (10,027 bytes)

33. Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:33:53 -0500
My rather stock 1275 with 5speed and 3.9 diff is just fine off the line. Wheel spin is a problem, but I think that is more of a driver issue. Frank, is your 1275 modified such that you don't have any
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01448.html (10,274 bytes)

34. Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:40:11 -0500
That's why I have the 4.2, 2nd-3rd was too far. The engine is modified with plaenty of low end torque. As it is with the 4.2, it's almost exactly as a stock Sprite 4 speed but I now have 5th. -- Fran
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01450.html (10,189 bytes)

35. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:16:17 -0500
Thanks, Frank. While I'm confident that a healthy 1275 can run at 4500 rpm, for as long as it needs to run there (BTDT), I'm sure I don't want to listen to it for more than an hour at a time. It driv
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01454.html (11,559 bytes)

36. Re[2]: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:11:33 -0800
Hello Bud, i have made such a chart for my own use, Datsun 5 speed, 4.22 rear end....175/70 13 tires is as follows... 1st gear, 1000 rpms = 4.4 mph 2nd gear, 1000 rpms = 7.15 mph 3rd gear, 1000 rpms
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01455.html (10,195 bytes)

37. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:40:43 GMT
"I run at 4500rpm all day" ....and you have spare engines on the shelf which you can rebuild and install quickly and economically! There are those of us who haven't your advantages at hand, for one r
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01458.html (10,175 bytes)

38. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 8:15:37 -0500
As far as fuel economy goes, a stock 1275 can do quite well. I actually checked the mileage on my 67 (many years ago). On a long highway trip I found that at 3500 rpm it got 36 mpg. At 4K, it got 38
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01459.html (9,329 bytes)

39. RE: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:54:34 GMT
Well then my esteemed and respected lister colleague, one thing is for sure....it didn't have a stock cam! :) With no intent toward disrespect or to argue, or to cast doubt upon your honor or veracit
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01460.html (10,612 bytes)

40. Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275 (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:12:19 -0600
And of course, on your long highway trip, were you going south? If so, you got better mileage, because you were going downhill!!! I normally drive in an absolutly perfect environment at all times, th
/html/spridgets/2005-12/msg01464.html (11,310 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu