Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Cars\s+\(non\-LBC\?\)\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:45:02 -0600
OK, Guys, it is quickly becoming time for a new car here. I thought I could start an incendiary thread here by asking for advice on what I should look at. I like to buy a new car, run it for about 8
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00142.html (9,211 bytes)

2. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 21:12:23 -0500
Ok so it's 4500 over your budget but it has a stick, is fun to drive, seats 5 comfortably, and still has a chrome grille. Jaguar X type. Under 30k at a Jaguar dealer near you. I have had mine for a y
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00156.html (8,414 bytes)

3. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 20:51:57 -0800
I have been most favorably impressed with my Jeep Comanche and Cherokees. All have gone well over 200,000 hard miles with only minor repairs. My neighbor now owns my 87 Cherokee and it has over 300,0
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00162.html (8,531 bytes)

4. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:18:55 -0500
If you're happy with the P/T Cruiser, this turbo Dodge guy votes for the Neon SRT. My son has a 98 Sport and auotcrosses the heck out of it all summer. It's approaching 95,000 miles, looks new, runs
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00164.html (11,683 bytes)

5. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:22:01 -0800
Hello David, wait a few weeks and at least examine the HONDA EXCITE when it comes out. also, the SO of Paul A. just bought a MAZDA somethingorother thats the same as the PONTIAC VIBE. check those out
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00165.html (8,503 bytes)

6. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 00:49:59 -0500
I forgot about our Cherokees. I agree, we have 147,000 (1987) and 135,000 (1990) and 103,000 (1993 Grand Cherokee) in our family right now. The most fun was the '86 turbo diesel 5 speed (195,000) se
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00166.html (9,697 bytes)

7. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 01:07:31 EST
Toyota Matrix? Chris Eck 59 Bugeye /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spri
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00167.html (8,042 bytes)

8. RE: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:00:02 -0600
Had I gone with a new car it would have been a WRX Wagon. The non-turbo equivalent might be longer-lived, but less fun. Personally, I expect everything to live to 150K+; even the disposbale Festiva i
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00182.html (10,531 bytes)

9. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 11:22:33 -0500
Excuse my ignorance but how do 5 adults fit into a Golf? jay f Innocenti Spiderville USA /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/lis
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00183.html (8,765 bytes)

10. RE: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 08:25:39 -0800
Ahhh... new cars... This is a totally non-reasoned, emotional choice, but I would vote for the PT cruiser, even if there was already one in the family! I must admit I have never driven one, but I dro
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00184.html (8,450 bytes)

11. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:46:33 -0600
52.7" of rear shoulder room. Admittedly not an ideal arrangement for a NY to LA jaunt, but legal nonetheless. Haven't you seen all of the circus acts with all of the clowns climbing out of a VW? Or
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00185.html (8,739 bytes)

12. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 09:17:50 -0800
I never considered the Neon, because the back seat is not really designed for 3 adults. He has been a great little car though. I put over 8,000 miles on him in 11 driving days and he never missed a b
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00187.html (8,983 bytes)

13. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:44:31 -0500
Come on Jay, I had 7 in my Sprite with the top up. Of course it took 3 to drive it but we all fit, sort of. -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ 2 Sprites, 2 Midgets http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut ///
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00189.html (8,400 bytes)

14. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:57:59 -0500
back in college we had 7 i nmy bugeye and drove it to the bar! ummmmmmmm, i do not remember the drive home....... chuck. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try ///
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00190.html (8,804 bytes)

15. Re: New Cars (non-LBC?) (score: 1)
Author: Unknown
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 12:00:27 -0800
Hi David, It's a Toyota Matrix. A "Sports wagon." Doesn't have a back seat for 3 who are 5' 10" though, but the fronts are great for tall people. She's almost 6', me about 6'2". It's an absolute blas
/html/spridgets/2002-12/msg00193.html (8,965 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu