Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[No\s+LBC\]\s+Warning\:\-\s+on\s+Soapbox\s+\-\s+Wow\!\s+250\+\s+e\-mails\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[No\s+LBC\]\s+Warning\:\-\s+on\s+Soapbox\s+\-\s+Wow\!\s+250\+\s+e\-mails\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [No LBC] Warning:- on Soapbox - Wow! 250+ e-mails. (score: 1): Author: Ron Corry <corry@iol.ie>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:47:51; Hi Listers, Been away for a few days, and I find I have now more than 250 e-mails to read, (not all are from this list) and some possibly, to respond to. As I started working through the backlog, a n; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg01306.html (11,287 bytes)
2. Re: [No LBC] Warning:- on Soapbox - Wow! 250+ e-mails. (score: 1): Author: "Tom Zuchowski" <tzuchow@ibm.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:37:51 -0400; My take on this list differs from yours a bit. It seems to me that many of the "worst offenders" for topic drift do seem to make an effort to update the topic header. It is one of the things about th; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg01308.html (9,773 bytes)
3. Re: [No LBC] Warning:- on Soapbox - Wow! 250+ e-mails. (score: 1): Author: Lmacy1211@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:23:48 EDT; I understand that. I can hit 3-400 over a weekend (gotta drop some of those lists) Gota agree - except it makes it easier to find a thread I have been following. When I am going to be aware from a c; /html/spridgets/1999-06/msg01310.html (9,184 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]