Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tonneau\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tonneau\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. tonneau (score: 1): Author: "Martin Pearce" <dungey@pearcem95.freeserve.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:24:35 -0000; Agree totally with your observations. My car has the closer allignment to the zip. The tonneau I purchased has the further apart allignment. Ah well, we live and learn. Martin '63 Spit4; /html/spitfires/2004-03/msg00115.html (6,354 bytes)
2. Tonneau (score: 1): Author: HD883HUGGR@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:13:04 EST; Hi Gang -- have a chance to buy a tonneau for my 77 Spit (my current one is just about toast from the Phoenix sun). Guy wants to sell right now... his is from a 71. Do I recall someone saying the sna; /html/spitfires/2000-01/msg00429.html (6,484 bytes)
3. Re: Tonneau (score: 1): Author: "Ree Gurley" <reegurley@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:49:57 -0600; I believe the snap PATTERN is the same; however, the '71 probably has metal snaps as opposed to the (lousy) plastic snaps. I changed all my '78 snaps to metal via a "Handi-pack Canvas Fastener Assor; /html/spitfires/2000-01/msg00431.html (6,926 bytes)
4. tonneau (score: 1): Author: Sam Gentry <hsgentry@cfw.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 19:19:14 -0400; I need a black or tan tonneau for a Mk 4 through 1500 Spitfire. If anyone has one in fair or better condition and would like to sell or swap, let me know. I have lots of GT6 and spitfire parts for sw; /html/spitfires/1999-08/msg00423.html (6,326 bytes)
5. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: "Bradley D. Richardson" <brichard@us.oracle.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 23:01:15 -0700; It's me, the guy you're buying the tan boot from. I have a black tonneau, for my 79 spitfire. It is in perfect condition, virtually new, looks like it's never been used. All snaps, four eye hooks fo; /html/spitfires/1999-08/msg00448.html (7,255 bytes)
6. tonneau (score: 1): Author: Sam Gentry <hsgentry@cfw.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 19:42:27 -0400; I have a pretty good tonneau for a Spit Mk III I think. At least it will not fit a Mk 4 or 1500 and it has the pockets for the high back seats. If anyone is interested send email and we can talk abou; /html/spitfires/1998-07/msg00177.html (6,380 bytes)
7. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: jak0pab@jak10.med.navy.mil (Bowen, Patrick A); Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 06:34:10; Plastic dashes were an option (fairly unpopular, I haven't seen any, I think the factory ones were actually vinyl covered) on early '70 Sptifires and GT-6's, but they are very popular home retrofits; /html/spitfires/1998-06/msg00002.html (7,548 bytes)
8. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 21:58:02 -0400 (EDT); Someone called? :-) Barry is correct. This indeed was a feature on at least the U.S.-spec. Mk.IV Spitfires, only for the 1972 model year. Why it wasn't there before or after is an interesting questio; /html/spitfires/1998-06/msg00014.html (7,392 bytes)
9. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 22:01:44 -0400 (EDT); Spitfires introduced the black dash with black-rimmed gauges, the tach and speedo being placed in front of the driver. For 1969 and, I think, at least part-way through the 1970 model year, these "Fed; /html/spitfires/1998-06/msg00015.html (7,671 bytes)
10. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 19:25:30 -0700; Thanks, I had thought that I was imagining things. I was under the impression that the early three piece dashes were made from plywood with the vinyl covering. When someone recently told me their Mk; /html/spitfires/1998-06/msg00018.html (8,458 bytes)
11. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: "the jolly rancher..." <njaremka@eng.buffalo.edu>; Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:07:51 -0400 (EDT); well, sam, my spitfire is also a '72, and there are no snaps on the doors or crash pad. after i started taking care of the car, and did a little research on spitfires, i came to the conclusion that a; /html/spitfires/1998-06/msg00028.html (8,034 bytes)
12. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: "the jolly rancher..." <njaremka@eng.buffalo.edu>; Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:24:31 -0400 (EDT); well, the more i hear about originality, the more on my car i believe to be original. this area around the tail lights on my spitfire is painted black, however up to now i always thought that a previ; /html/spitfires/1998-06/msg00029.html (7,306 bytes)
13. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: Bob Sykes <s1500@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 22:27:14 -0700; The recent observations on "snapless" MkIVs would appear to be further substantiated in John Thomason's "Guide to Originality". There are several good shots of these cars with and without the snaps/; /html/spitfires/1998-06/msg00031.html (7,012 bytes)
14. tonneau (score: 1): Author: Sam Gentry <hsgentry@cfw.com>; Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 13:14:39 -0400; I am looking at a 72 Spitfire Mk IV. I notice that there are no Tonneau snaps on the doors or under the windscreen. There is no indication that the car has been painted or the crash pad replaced, but; /html/spitfires/1998-05/msg00428.html (6,632 bytes)
15. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 14:23:05 -0400 (EDT); Yes, it was. It's not unusual to see a '72 without the door snap posts, but it's a bit more unusual to see one without the posts on the dash. Correct again. The wood began, at least on U.S. models, w; /html/spitfires/1998-05/msg00431.html (7,287 bytes)
16. Re: tonneau (score: 1): Author: Atwell Haines <carbuff@scooter.net>; Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 21:22:52 -0400; I have a Spit Mark IV new car brochure, and it states that the tonneau was an option. Interestingly, the car pictured has the snaps on the doors, but nothing on the dash. It would seem so. Same broch; /html/spitfires/1998-05/msg00440.html (7,464 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]