Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rude\s+and\s+crude\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rude\s+and\s+crude\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. RE: rude and crude (score: 1): Author: "Gregory W. Smith" <gsmith@cvn.net>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 00:33:09 -0500; ourselves about how powerful, fast, ..... our cars are, there is just no way on Earth (at least the one on which I live) that yours or any other Spitfire engined car will be able to keep up with a s; /html/spitfires/1998-12/msg00174.html (9,727 bytes)
22. Re: rude and crude (score: 1): Author: Reed Mideke <rmideke@interbase.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 08:46:25 -0800; If your interested in the future of the wankle motor, and perhaps the motorcar, check out http://moller.com And yes, it's estimated to be even faster than the rospit. hmmm... that wasn't really rude; /html/spitfires/1998-12/msg00180.html (8,662 bytes)
23. rude and crude (score: 1): Author: Ken Bertschy <kentop@dakotacom.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 17:24:43 -0700; Enough of this "smooth the ruffled feathers" politically correct nonsense. I want to see Laura spank the wankle! How about some actual numbers? What do your cars really do? Take your cars out and get; /html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00607.html (6,748 bytes)
24. Re: rude and crude (score: 1): Author: Ken Bertschy <kentop@dakotacom.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 19:37:48 -0700; Actually, all I want to see are two figures: elapsed time for zero to sixty, and top speed after one quarter mile. All the other stuff is "nice to know", but the red meat lies in those two.; /html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00613.html (6,486 bytes)
25. Re: rude and crude (score: 1): Author: Chip Mautz <clmautz@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 10:53:50 -0800 (PST); nonsense. numbers? What "Spank the wankle?" I think we've got the "Phrase of the week", ladies and gents! Chip ==; /html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00702.html (6,670 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 25
Page: [1] [2]