Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+6\s+\-\s+an\s+approach\s+I\s+haven\'t\s+seen\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+6\s+\-\s+an\s+approach\s+I\s+haven\'t\s+seen\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Spit 6 - an approach I haven't seen (score: 1): Author: "Michael D. Nugent, Ph.D." <nugentmd@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2000 20:35:10 -0700; If you have a minute, please take a look at http://home1.gte.net/nugentmd/79panels.htm and give me some feedback on the difficulties with that approach. If it's possible, it would allow me to use the; /html/spitfires/2000-07/msg00031.html (7,346 bytes)
2. Re: Spit 6 - an approach I haven't seen (score: 1): Author: "Tod Jones" <todjones@rica.net>; Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 07:09:12 -0400; This is the way i just used to repair a 66 round tail spit using a 77 square tail body tub. I don't know about converting the GT6, but converting between the body styles was a lot of work. I replaced; /html/spitfires/2000-07/msg00038.html (8,048 bytes)
3. Re: Spit 6 - an approach I haven't seen (score: 1): Author: "Ree Gurley" <reegurley@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:28:14 -0500; I'm probably not qualified to judge your overall approach. However, the two holes in the windshield header that you asked about (on your web-site) are for the forward attaching bolts for the factory; /html/spitfires/2000-07/msg00093.html (7,937 bytes)
4. Re: Spit 6 - an approach I haven't seen (score: 1): Author: "Mike Ross" <mikeross@Prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:36:53 -0400; In regards to your question: "correct" but tedious answer), >cut on one side or the other of the raised seam (specify which side and why), or . . . You can either cut out the panels below the flange; /html/spitfires/2000-07/msg00110.html (9,277 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]