- 1. New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "DT Gebhard" <kimkell@decaturnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 09:42:37 -0500
- Spitlisters, just got the new VB catalogue today. Check out the back page...Pacesetter headers...I know that from the looks of the picture,it'll NEVER fit on my Spit!!! Dave PS Don't these people hav
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00741.html (7,309 bytes)
- 2. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:30:02 -0700
- No disrespect intended, but just playing devil's advocate, how are you so certain that they won't fit from a picture? And how do you know the headers pictured are not designed for the "other" range
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00743.html (8,655 bytes)
- 3. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "alemen@pop.ftconnect.com" <alemen@pop.ftconnect.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:46:30 -0400
- I agree with Jeff. Most of the catalogues always show a "stock" photo of the part for some other car or year or model and almost never for your own car. Quite often it the original manufacturer that
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00744.html (9,564 bytes)
- 4. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "DT Gebhard" <kimkell@decaturnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:05:49 -0500
- Jeff when you get the magazine,you'll see what I mean. The exhaust would have to dump out in front of the Spitfire. It looks like the negative is reversed to save space on the page. Dave -- Original
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00746.html (9,532 bytes)
- 5. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff McNeal" <jmcneal@ohms.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:19:40 -0700
- I replied to Dave offline, but the photo is correct. It's a shot of the BACK side of the headers, not the front side. You can see the exhaust ports on the mounting flanges if you look close enough. B
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00747.html (10,860 bytes)
- 6. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "DT Gebhard" <kimkell@decaturnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:01:53 -0500
- Upon closer examination...your are correct. Sorry for any confusion I may have cause!!! I really need to get my eyes checked!!! Dave(exiting with foot in mouth!) -- Original Message -- From: Jeff McN
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00749.html (11,961 bytes)
- 7. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "MikeC" <mikech@sprynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:21:49 -0600
- I got the catalog today. Mine has it oriented correctly, exiting on the passenger (LHD) side of the car. Weird. MikeC
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00750.html (7,526 bytes)
- 8. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 21:11:46 -0700
- It's a good photo on my catalog. The picture shows the orientation of the header as if it were viewed from the driver's seat. The flange points to the left and the outlet points to the rear. I can't
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00757.html (9,984 bytes)
- 9. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: John Goethert <john@triumphspitfire.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:07:04 -0400
- On a related subject, I have been told by a reliable source that the manufacturer of Pacesetter is/was having problems making the Spitfire headers. The jig was off and they made a bunch that did not
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00764.html (8,090 bytes)
- 10. Re: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "MikeC" <mikech@sprynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:02:16 -0600
- Now you tell me. Last fall I had to have a muffler shop bend mine so it would clear the frame. MikeC
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00779.html (7,490 bytes)
- 11. RE: New Vicky Brit (score: 1)
- Author: "Bowen, Patrick A RP2" <PABowen@sar.med.navy.mil>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:01:22 -0400
- Thats alright Mike, I just had to have mine done three weeks ago, and the muffler shop slightly crimped it! Patrick Bowen Now you tell me. Last fall I had to have a muffler shop bend mine so it would
- /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00809.html (8,328 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu