Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+OT\s+reverse\s+osmosis\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+OT\s+reverse\s+osmosis\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Mike Wojton" <mwojton@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:06:48 -0400; I've been reading up on these systems a little bit today. It seems that a reverse osmosis system generates a good deal of waste water compared to the clean water you actually get. It has to do with t; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00051.html (10,369 bytes)
2. Re: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Paul Nimz" <pnimz@v8sho.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:19:05 -0500; Use a carbon cartage filter. Paul _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00052.html (8,478 bytes)
3. RE: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:17:18 -0400; I'm on a well, so water usage is irrelevant to me. The amount of waste water is not that much. Still well worth it for drinking, and still a lot cheaper than buying bottled water (which is mostly RO; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00053.html (11,703 bytes)
4. Re: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: Rialb9@aol.com; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:23:55 EDT; Water here in N. Florida is EXPENSIVE. My bill this month is $275. Not fun. Blair 91+ Stock _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.te; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00054.html (6,807 bytes)
5. Re: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: Ron Childs <rbchilds@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:48:42 -0700 (PDT); I would suggest weekly showers and only flush weekly using bottled water for both. Also, drink beer. :) -- Original Message -- Water here in N. Florida is EXPENSIVE. My bill this month is $275. Not f; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00055.html (8,024 bytes)
6. RE: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:12:51 -0400; Does that also include landscape irrigation? If so, is sewage charged on that water? Some of the suburbs around Detroit that are on the Detroit water system have the option of a 2nd water meter that; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00056.html (8,999 bytes)
7. RE: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 06:20:53 -0500; I understand but all I'm saying is that if the water is undrinkable and you are going out and buying bottled water, an RO system, with its associated 'waste' water is still going to save you money. P; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00058.html (9,180 bytes)
8. Re: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Mike Wojton" <mwojton@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:08:05 -0400; So clearly, at those kinds of prices, I don't want a whole house system. I didn't want to have to run a separate line to the kitchen sink just for this, but I may have to. I'll have to look around at; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00059.html (9,496 bytes)
9. RE: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:56:11 -0400; BTW, I stumbled across this: http://www.howstuffworks.com/question29.htm $200 - $300 will get you an RO under-sink system. I replace my filters every 2-3 years (it was 2.5 years this time) for about; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00062.html (10,382 bytes)
10. RE: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:58:26 -0400; The Pur filters work great. They clean up the skanky water that my Dad gets in Phoenix, and we used to use them before we got the RO. I would use a Pur for the fridge ice, but an RO is still better f; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00063.html (10,348 bytes)
11. Re: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Zach Leahy" <leahyz@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:13:37 -0400; So I shouldn't mention that my bill for water this month was $14.XX? That's for a single guy in a 1300ft^2 house (with occasional overnight guests) and no irrigation (WTF do I care if my lawn is a bi; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00064.html (11,748 bytes)
12. RE: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 11:31:47 -0500; Don't bother with the Pur systems. With municipal water systems, they don't do much. What you want out can only be removed with a RO process. There are table top RO systems but for the small incremen; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00066.html (10,869 bytes)
13. RE: [Shotimes] OT reverse osmosis (score: 1): Author: "Juillerat, Aaron J" <aaronj@autojectors.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:46:35 -0400; Ah the good old days of living in Fort Wayne. The land of inexpensive. Although my water bill now is still good really. Family of 5 average around $24 a month water only no sewer. Congrats on the eng; /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00068.html (12,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]