Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+weight\s+capacity\s+of\s+aluminum\s+channel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+weight\s+capacity\s+of\s+aluminum\s+channel\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] weight capacity of aluminum channel (score: 1): Author: "john niolon" <jniolon@att.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 21:56:24 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format --==0272873723724904883== This is a multi-part message in MIME format --mCruWevkvc93kkJPhqZN3xrhuSodtlu4=_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cont; /html/shop-talk/2021-07/msg00000.html (49,422 bytes)
2. Re: [Shop-talk] weight capacity of aluminum channel (score: 1): Author: Donald H Locker <dhlocker@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:16:19 -0400; BIG NOTE: please check my calculations and assumptions; I haven't actually done any of this for nearly 40 years. TLDR: They might not work. The significant supporting bits are the two flanges (3in x; /html/shop-talk/2021-07/msg00001.html (13,511 bytes)
3. Re: [Shop-talk] weight capacity of aluminum channel (score: 1): Author: Donald H Locker <dhlocker@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:29:07 -0400; First oops - I used 10ft length, not 8ft. At 8ft, the numbers look better by about 20% Donald. -- *Plain Text* email -- it's an accessibility issue () no proprietary attachments; no html mail /\ <htt; /html/shop-talk/2021-07/msg00002.html (14,946 bytes)
4. Re: [Shop-talk] weight capacity of aluminum channel (score: 1): Author: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 08:42:16 -0400; --==7484050273822021780== --000000000000d5cfb305c62349b8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I haven't done it on 35 years, but at least your equations look familiar. I find that comforting.; /html/shop-talk/2021-07/msg00003.html (28,825 bytes)
5. Re: [Shop-talk] weight capacity of aluminum channel (score: 1): Author: Donald H Locker <dhlocker@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 09:11:50 -0400; Some central supports would certainly help. I think my bigger concern (which a good central support would help) would be stress distribution and channel twisting. If either of the channels tipped (du; /html/shop-talk/2021-07/msg00004.html (21,911 bytes)
6. Re: [Shop-talk] weight capacity of aluminum channel (score: 1): Author: Pat Horne <patintexas@icloud.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 09:16:21 -0500; You might want to consider adding supports under the center of the ramps so the effective length of the ramps is half of the overall length. Peace, Pat Pat Horne We support Habitat for Humanity BI; /html/shop-talk/2021-07/msg00006.html (14,910 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]