- 1. Re: Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1)
- Author: geomowat@vossnet.co.uk (George Mowat-Brown)
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 1998 18:25:47 +0100
- The aesthetics of mark I over mark II are very much in the eye of the beholder, my own feeling is that the mark I version looks a bit nicer, but the multitude of mechanical improvements over the prod
- /html/rolls-bentley/1998-04/msg00001.html (12,055 bytes)
- 2. Re: Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Follstad <farkle@winternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 11:38:15 -0600
- I agree on your MK I versus MK II differences and prices would support my purchase of an earlier model, but the 2000+ modification that R-R made over lifetime of the car makes a later one more desira
- /html/rolls-bentley/1998-04/msg00002.html (12,391 bytes)
- 3. Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1)
- Author: Carl Follstad <farkle@winternet.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 23:21:01 -0600 (CST)
- I just read a message on the declining availability of parts for Bentley R-types. Got me thinking and I am wondering if I could bend an ear (fingers?) for an opinion or two. I have been an avid fan
- /html/rolls-bentley/1998-03/msg00005.html (8,070 bytes)
- 4. Re: Opinions of "cost of ownership" of R-R cars ... (score: 1)
- Author: Berry Kercheval <berry@kerch.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 23:53:46 -0800
- I have a Mk VI and just purchased a T-Bentley. Mk VI parts are a bit scarce, but there are several specialists (Replacement Parts, Tony Handler, Oregon Crewe Cutters), and the clubs (BDC, and RROC) c
- /html/rolls-bentley/1998-03/msg00006.html (9,124 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu