Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+the\s+need\s+for\s+speed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+the\s+need\s+for\s+speed\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: Steve Parham <thebttmline@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:09:10 -0700 (PDT); Hi all! I've been browsing the archives and it appears that most folks obtain higher highway speeds by replacing the rear end - replacing the standard 3.90 gears. This is what I've been planning to d; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00308.html (8,106 bytes)
2. RE: [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: Jack Halton <safesix@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:44:23 -0400 (EDT); I have been using overdrive transmissions for years and they have a big advantage in that you can keep the 3.90 for torque but drop to 2.73 on the highway when cruising with no load. The 5 and 6 spee; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00314.html (9,675 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>; Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 17:14:57 -0400; I share Jack's enthusiasm for OD tranny's. I like the low rear ratio for torque and feel that going to a higher ratio' can be a compromise- trading low end driveability for top end and not getting th; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00315.html (10,834 bytes)
4. RE: [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: "Ralph Linnell" <chevysix@seatac.net>; Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 14:41:08 -0700; I ran the same 4-speed overdrive, that Jack has, behind my Inline 261. I loved it for all the same reasons. I could drive around town in 3rd or 4th gear with out shifting down and yet when I hit the; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00316.html (11,898 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: "Deve Krehbiel" <deve@wwwebservice.net>; Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 17:36:36 -0500; yes, and anyone willing to part with a 4 spd OD tranny, please contact me. I am ready for one as well! Deve advantage in that you can keep the 3.90 for torque but drop to 2.73 on the highway when cru; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00317.html (10,701 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: MKlepp4335@cs.com; Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 20:59:34 EDT; << give me some of the pros and cons of a new rear end vs. overdrive >> I have a Borg Warner 3 speed OD behind my 235 with a 3.90 positrac six lug truck rear. It gives the best of both worlds, good t; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00319.html (7,816 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: "william moldenhauer" <wmh678@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 20:37:27 -0500; oh Deve I new you had some hot rod blood in ya! Bill 53 3600 hot rod Chicago,Ill. My Website www.hotrodstogo.com "Give a man a fish,he will eat for a day Teach a man to fish and he will sit in a boat; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00320.html (11,994 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] the need for speed (score: 1): Author: Steve Parham <thebttmline@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:49:13 -0700 (PDT); ...We'll be glad to help you learn!... Just wanted to say thanks to Jim and everyone else for all of your advice regarding my rear end vs overdrive questions! Thanks! Steve __ _____|L\___ Steve Parha; /html/oletrucks/2000-05/msg00355.html (7,503 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]