- 1. [oletrucks] Frame differences (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:36:30 -0700
- I have a pretty good idea how a Chevy 1/2-ton frame is different from a Chevy 3/4-ton frame. I know at least a little about the differences between early and late frames. And I've been told how a GMC
- /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00333.html (8,381 bytes)
- 2. RE: [oletrucks] Frame differences (score: 1)
- Author: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:39:49 -0500
- I have a 57 GMC 102, which is 1/2 ton 123" wheelbase (89" bed). I don't have the Chevy to compare with, but would be glad to take measurements, etc. I believe that this frame uses thicker material in
- /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00336.html (9,039 bytes)
- 3. Re: [oletrucks] Frame differences (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:43:23 -0700
- My trucks are all AD and I think completely different, so while it might be interesting, I don't think it would actually tell me what I'd like to know. I have a 57 GMC 102, which is 1/2 ton 123" whee
- /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00338.html (9,529 bytes)
- 4. RE: [oletrucks] Frame differences (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg O. Pace" <59gmc@bigriverbroadcasting.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:45:12 -0500
- I have a similar interest... my '59 GMC 100 LWB needs the rear shock crossmember (it's completely gone). Is the Chevy 1/2 ton SWB crossmember the same? Thanks! GOP (cut) GMC made 1/2-ton long bed tru
- /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00340.html (7,600 bytes)
- 5. RE: [oletrucks] Frame differences (score: 1)
- Author: Devin Ranger <devin_ranger@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
- I believe that they are identical; I have a LWB GMC frame (100) and a SWB Chevrolet frame (3100) -- both '56s -- for comparison. I will have to check the dimensions to be sure, but they look like th
- /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00348.html (8,464 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu