Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+302\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+302\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] 302 (score: 1): Author: mark <ccpanel@jps.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:59:01 -0700; man-im way over my head but thats how you learn right?! =) i have access to military 302 and already have a gmc 270 which one is better power without fancy add-ons? are either of them better than a23; /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00299.html (8,157 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] 302 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 08:19:02 -0700; The GMC motors are better in a variety of ways, aside from just being bigger. Properly built you should get more service out of the GMC. My 270 pushes my AD Suburban down the road at 70 real easy, bu; /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00304.html (8,956 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] 302 (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:02:45 -0700; Mark, I read someplace, I think in Patrick's catalogue, that the 302 had bigger valves and "breathed" better. You might see if anybody has a Patrick's catalog (and can find it!!) and double check it.; /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00311.html (8,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]