Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spindles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spindles\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Spindles (score: 1): Author: DGreimel@aol.com; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 19:21:08 EST; Bretheren Moggers: Could anyone tell me what the difference is between the + 8 spindles and those that are on my ~66 4/4. I know that the metalurgy was lousy in the older cars but is there something; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00042.html (7,159 bytes)
2. Re: Spindles (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 23:09:24 -0800; The +8 style or heavy duty spindles are larger diameter. Standard stub axle are 5/8 inch at the outer bearing , heavy duty stub axles are 3/4 inch at the outer bearing. The inner part of the stub axl; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00044.html (7,997 bytes)
3. Re: Spindles (score: 1): Author: DGreimel@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 05:18:11 EST; Hi Greg. Thanks for the reply. I, and several of my morgan racing friends had our spidles heat treated during the early 60`s. We all had +4s, mine was an SS. The results were (a) no more spindle flex; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00045.html (8,339 bytes)
4. RE: Spindles (score: 1): Author: Kerry Seibert <ckchapel@fast.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 21:44:58 -0500; DON - on my +8 I have decambered the front to 0 degrees. This was done on the recommendation of a Morgan racing specialist in the UK (MacDonald if I recall - I bought the lower plates and other bits; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00048.html (10,583 bytes)
5. Re: Spindles (score: 1): Author: "Ernest(Chip) Brown" <Chip.Brown@msdw.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 08:41:50 -0500; For what it's worth, on my '57 Plus 4 I have a 0-degree subframe, the reinforcing bars from the top of the spring towers to the frame, and plus 8 reinforcing bars on the bottom going back to the chas; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00050.html (7,757 bytes)
6. Spindles (score: 1): Author: DGreimel@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 21:29:57 EST; Greg, You had asked about the heat treating process and hardness that I was able to achieve with the 62 SS spindles. I am reasonabley certain that we got Rockwell 22 BUT when I went to the same treat; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00165.html (7,337 bytes)
7. RE: Spindles (score: 1): Author: Kerry Seibert <ckchapel@fast.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 14:03:00 -0500; DON - I have not heard of any breakage of 4/4 spindles but I have heard tales of bending them. If you do not want to use +8 spindles then I would use competition/HD +4 spindles. I am assuming they ar; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00169.html (7,963 bytes)
8. Re: Spindles (score: 1): Author: DGreimel@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 07:59:47 EST; That is what I wanted to know. Now the quesion is - what makes them heavy duty if they are the same size? Thanks Don; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00173.html (6,950 bytes)
9. Re: Spindles (score: 1): Author: ARoman4047@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 08:20:49 EST; ...not to be a cynic, but to mangle Shakespeare, perhaps it's all in the name? Tony in NJ (W.A.S.T.E.) Good question!; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00174.html (7,031 bytes)
10. Re: Spindles (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:55:16 -0800; Plus Eight and heavy duty +4 spindles have stub axles that are the same size as one another. They are both 3/4 inch in diameter at their outer ends and larger at the inner bearing. Regular +4 and 4/4; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00175.html (7,842 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]