- 1. Responding (score: 1)
- Author: "Arlo J. Levisen" <alevisen@gdhscats.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 18:01:09 +0300
- I have been reading the comments about the Morgan being a real car, etc. I have both a Miata and a Morgan and I think it a bit harsh to refer to the Miata simply as an "appliance". First of all, the
- /html/morgans/1999-02/msg00191.html (7,877 bytes)
- 2. RE: Responding (score: 1)
- Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:57:12 -0500
- I'll own up to using the term "appliance" and I applied it with my tongue firmly planted in my cheek. To me, something that works all the time and needs little or no attention, is an appliance. Ther
- /html/morgans/1999-02/msg00193.html (9,637 bytes)
- 3. Re: Responding (score: 1)
- Author: jimgcusavecom@webtv.net (Jim G)
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 20:03:34 -0500 (EST)
- I wonder how many 1998 Miatas will be running in, say 2028? I'll bet you over 75% of the 1998 Morgans will be. That's the difference between Morgan and Miata. JimG '64 +4
- /html/morgans/1999-02/msg00194.html (6,557 bytes)
- 4. Re: Responding (score: 1)
- Author: "Stuart J. Ross" <stuross@nac.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:40:47 -0500
- I suspect that there will be a considerable number of Miatas still running in 2028 (if EPA rules don't force them into the crushers). The Miata club is very active and Miata owners seem to be both en
- /html/morgans/1999-02/msg00199.html (8,810 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu