Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\/model\s+yr\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\/model\s+yr\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Engine/model yr? (score: 1): Author: "Harry Granito" <hgranito@umich.edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 09:03:00 -0400; Please help. I purchased what I believe to be a 1960 +4. it has a serial not a 1960. It has a serial # on the block of CT4815E. Would this be a 1962 TR-4? The car was totally rebuilt in 1980 so the e; /html/morgans/1999-07/msg00006.html (6,604 bytes)
2. Re: Engine/model yr? (score: 1): Author: Bob Tescione <mogman@rpa.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 09:35:05 -0400; Hello Harry: Engine # does sound like an early TR4, with CT prefix. Without an ME suffix, it is an engine that was not originally sold in a Morgan. An engine original to the car would have had an eng; /html/morgans/1999-07/msg00007.html (7,230 bytes)
3. Re: Engine/model yr? (score: 1): Author: A Hart Jr <arthart@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 09:50:17 -0400; According to my reference books, you are absolutely correct. The car is from 1960 and the engine was probably from a 1962 TR-4. Had it been originally in a Morgan it would have an "M" suffix on the; /html/morgans/1999-07/msg00008.html (7,069 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]