Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Differences\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Differences\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: Jane McDaid <Murphys@ziplink.net>; Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 13:23:54 -0400; On the contrary, I think old HFS would have seized on the opportunity to advance the handling of the car at little added expense. OTOH, MGTD's had a steel scuttle support hoop from the early fifties,; /html/morgans/1998-08/msg00000.html (6,592 bytes)
2. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>; Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 12:19:53 +0100; Firstly, finding one, I am UK resident, so getting bits for my car is easy. Melvyn Rutter has scuttle roll bars listed but the applications are not stated explicitly- as he has a presence here on the; /html/morgans/1998-08/msg00006.html (7,412 bytes)
3. Differences (score: 1): Author: Bob Nogueira <nogera@prodigy.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 98 13:49:32 -0500; -- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #3.1a ] -- Okay its slow on the list and I'm back at the offiice so let me see if I can start something here: Saturday the local MOG group did a tour to a small town; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00109.html (7,851 bytes)
4. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: "David P. Crandall" <davidc@netwrk.org>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 18:51:50 -0400; Well, why not weigh in. I've noticed a tremendous difference between by 66 4/4 and 63 DHC +4. Apart from the possibility that a 74 4/4 differs, my vote is for chassis differences between the two. +4s; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00110.html (8,580 bytes)
5. Differences (score: 1): Author: MX2SS@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 19:47:52 EDT; I'll add my two cents to this discussion. Newer Morgans do ride a lot better than older ones. Why do I think so? The under cowl roll bar. No chassis twisting or cowl shake. My 1991 4/4 came with one; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00111.html (7,413 bytes)
6. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: Phil Fisher <pcfisher@ibm.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 17:38:21 -0800; Viva la difference! My first observations of significant difference are a bit dated -- we got our 1970 4/4 4-seater in 1972 after having owned a +4 SS for two years. My very first impressions were in; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00113.html (10,387 bytes)
7. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 19:21:49 +0100; Both the new 1800cc 4/4 and the current +8 seem to ride much better than their 25 year old predecessors. The obvious changes are the scuttle roll bar, the tubular rear dampers and the rear bar for th; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00116.html (8,108 bytes)
8. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: Bob Tescione <mogman@rpa.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 15:21:44 -0400; So does this imply that we who have older Morgans can improve the car's ride by changing to tubular shocks in the rear with a cross brace and possibly rigging a scuttle brace? Or does a better ride b; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00117.html (8,610 bytes)
9. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: "Stuart J. Ross" <stuross@nac.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 17:28:50 -0400; Let me put my 2 cents (or 2 shillings) into this discussion. One thing that the newer cars have are soft seats! My 63+4 has wooden boxes with a cushion on them that passes for seats. I would guess th; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00118.html (9,562 bytes)
10. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: "Gary" <garc@iinet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 22:16:23 +0800; Ride? Ride is what lesser cars have back behind the Morgan whose handling has taken it far into the distance! I think that the shock absorber changes over the years make a huge difference, also the t; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00124.html (9,041 bytes)
11. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Edwards <jeremy@jmemee.demon.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 18:26:04 +0100; snip When my car was rebuilt I added the scuttle roll bar and the tubular rear dampers to a new chassis and I feel it does ride better- instead of the chassis twisting the springs are made to work a; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00129.html (8,492 bytes)
12. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: Arlin Robins <arlin@slip.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 21:34:49 -0700; Jeremy, What's required to retrofit a scuttle roll bar in an older +4? Michael Jhon '61 +4; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00130.html (7,355 bytes)
13. Re: Differences (score: 1): Author: "Hermen Pol" <polmognl@wxs.nl>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 11:05:05 +0200; What?? A scuttle roll bar in a 1961 +4? That would be spoiling the character of the car! Good old HFS would turn in his grave if he heard about it... Hermen Pol; /html/morgans/1998-07/msg00132.html (7,125 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]