Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Compression\s+Issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Compression\s+Issues\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Compression Issues (score: 1): Author: jpavone@vanstar.com; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 06:25:02 -0700; I recently ran a compression test on the nearly stock Ford 1600 crossflow in my 59' 4/4 1600 during the course of a tuneup . The compression test showed 150, 131, 132 and 149 on cyls 1 through 4 when; /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00000.html (7,385 bytes)
2. RE: Compression Issues (score: 1): Author: Phil Roettjer <Phil.Roettjer@quantum.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 08:40:02 -0700; You didn't mention what compression you saw on the first stroke? Did you see 90+ or more? I also usually keep turning the engine over until the reading stabilizes and use that as the final reading.; /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00001.html (8,658 bytes)
3. Re: Compression Issues (score: 1): Author: "F Kuzyk" <fkuzyk@cgocable.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:53:58 -0400; I would agree with John. A leak down test can be more accurate. I've done them with a Mighty Vac Pump. But the numbers quoted on your compression test are fairly consistent, especially the 2nd set,; /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00002.html (10,193 bytes)
4. Re: Compression Issues (score: 1): Author: "wms" <wms@vaxxine.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 15:43:41 -0400; Hope the engine in my 4/4 looks as good as yours John. If your going to use it for general driving I wouldn't make any changes unless you get free gaskets etc. Talking about engines , has anyone hea; /html/morgans/1999-10/msg00003.html (8,114 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]