Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+suspension\s+geometry\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+suspension\s+geometry\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. rear suspension geometry (score: 1): Author: "teds" <teds@accessone.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 21:07:10 -0700; a question on the rear shock replacement with tube shocks... my 77 mgb came with this done, I have some kind of Monroe shocks in the rear. however my car has a real stiff rear suspension, in looking; /html/mgs/1999-08/msg00273.html (7,071 bytes)
2. Re: rear suspension geometry (score: 1): Author: "Harlan Jillson" <hjillson@argolink.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 18:12:47 -0500; In a word, yes. Angling the shock forward does reduce its efficiency. The resistance of the dampner ( shock), which is used to dampen the oscillation of the springs during compression and rebound, i; /html/mgs/1999-08/msg00290.html (9,640 bytes)
3. Re: rear suspension geometry (score: 1): Author: "teds" <teds@accessone.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 17:21:10 -0700; Harlan, thanks for your detailed reply. I understand what you mean about the tube shock/spring rebound rate. I wonder however that since the shock(s) were not really designed to operate in this plane; /html/mgs/1999-08/msg00293.html (11,742 bytes)
4. Re: rear suspension geometry (score: 1): Author: "Jason Dutt" <jason@markerman.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 00:59:04 -0400; I'm pretty sure the Munroe shock conversion is nearly indentical to the SPAX in it's installation. If so, it is entirely reversible. If this is a daily driver and you're not too concerned about perf; /html/mgs/1999-08/msg00301.html (8,023 bytes)
5. Re: rear suspension geometry (score: 1): Author: "Thomas James Pokrefke, III" <pokrefke@netdoor.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 00:12:17 -0500; On Sun, 8 Aug 1999 00:59:04 -0400 "Jason Dutt" <jason@markerman.com> wrote (and I quote): Jason: Trucks use this arrangement to help prevent the axle from twisting as the truck acclerates. Truck engi; /html/mgs/1999-08/msg00303.html (7,789 bytes)
6. Re: rear suspension geometry (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 16:40:26 -0700; Hmmm, in my experience, if you look under the rear of *most* cars you will find that the shocks are not exactly vertical (at least live axle setups, not IRS). Especially those jacked-up 4x4s, they of; /html/mgs/1999-08/msg00319.html (8,559 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]