- 1. jag e-type (score: 1)
- Author: Johnmowog@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 16:14:45 EDT
- First I coudn't agree more with point #1!!! the example given in the price of fixing up a GT to perfection as opposed to the initial cost of the E-type. First, I see decent E-type coupes for less tha
- /html/mgs/1999-07/msg01391.html (8,636 bytes)
- 2. Re: jag e-type (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:08:48 -0700
- I speak with the voice of experience. Yes, but a reasonably stock E-type would blow the doors off just about any MGB that was still recognizable as such. I said that was about what I was expecting to
- /html/mgs/1999-07/msg01398.html (11,327 bytes)
- 3. Re: jag e-type (score: 1)
- Author: Johnmowog@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 22:52:57 EDT
- I think the original question was regarding the viablility of doing a cheap resto on a clapped-out E-Type, both regarding value and trouble. I'd say we both agree that the car he described was a very
- /html/mgs/1999-07/msg01438.html (11,545 bytes)
- 4. Re: jag e-type (score: 1)
- Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 23:57:40 -0400
- Hmmm... see below. Not many men on this planet that wouldn't take the E! Hmmm... well, depends what you are after. Don't get me wrong I have three MGs, but by just about any metric you can't put the
- /html/mgs/1999-07/msg01441.html (8,984 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu