Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*S\.U\.s\s+or\s+Webers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*S\.U\.s\s+or\s+Webers\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: drded@ix.netcom.com (David Deutsch); Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 07:53:37 -0800; Hey we have to discuss something. I my humble opinion, I'd prefer a good pair of SUs any day of the week. I understand that a single Weber may be less mantenance but one of my joys of MG ownership is; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01016.html (8,441 bytes)
2. RE: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 11:10:53 -0500; My thoughts exactly ... Agree ... I'm not sure that Iike the new "kinder gentler Dave" ... it kind of makes me nervous. ;^) Safety Fast! ... larry.g.unger@lmco.com; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01017.html (8,212 bytes)
3. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: CMaster808@aol.com; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 11:17:17 -0500 (EST); INCOMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CHET; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01018.html (7,605 bytes)
4. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: thomas_pokrefke@juno.com (Thomas J Pokrefke); Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 12:55:53 EST; True enough the SU look better and perform better. In my case, however, they were far from practical. With frequent fluctuations in temperatures, the SU's were impossible to keep in tune. Case in po; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01025.html (8,619 bytes)
5. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca (JOHN MCEWEN); Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 11:43:05 -0500; Now THAT is the mark of a true LBC enthusiast. Only someone who has been there and done that would carry spare carburetors. For those of you who are present or former members of the world wide Boy S; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01026.html (9,145 bytes)
6. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: Ross Overcash <jroverca@tiac.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 15:25:51 -0500 (EST); Ya know that the last paragraph of the above really sums up the whole thing with MG's! We all have our personal preferences when it comes to our cars. Some won't drive except when the sun is high in; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01031.html (9,837 bytes)
7. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: Ross Overcash <jroverca@tiac.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 15:25:57 -0500 (EST); I'm confused? The SU's on my 74B have not been touched in three years (save topping up the dampers) and my car starts regardless of the weather, I have never had a problem running at 65mph either! OK; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01032.html (9,435 bytes)
8. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: RJohn50603@aol.com; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 17:02:54 -0500 (EST); << I my humble opinion, I'd prefer a good pair of SUs any day of the week. David, I agree, at least from the standpoint that I have had good service from my HIF's for nearly ten years of everyday dri; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01040.html (8,564 bytes)
9. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: George G Curl <gcurl@tenet.edu>; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 16:06:25 -0600 (CST); Ross, as a long time driver of English and German stuff, I agree! Of it ain't broke don't fix it. A little PM is fine but let a sleeping dog lie. George; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01042.html (9,759 bytes)
10. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: "W. R. Gibbons" <gibbons@northpole.med.uvm.edu>; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 21:45:19 -0500 (EST); A likely explanation is that the engine was simply running cooler than the temp the carbs were adjusted at. Put in a 180 or 190 thermostat, and maybe a bit of cardboard over part of the radiator to c; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01053.html (8,770 bytes)
11. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: Robert Allen <boballen@sky.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 10:33:31 -0600; Humble? I suppose if you want a stock car to run as stock, then you need some of those "Skinners Union" things. And, I suppose, it I ever had a 'new' set of SUs then maybe I would think they are okay; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01057.html (12,031 bytes)
12. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: mgb72@airmail.net (Chad Cooper); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 97 18:44:28 -0600 (CST); Amen Bob, everything I wanted to say but didn't want to type, so I just defended my point with the cost difference between new SU's and donated Webers with a thirteen dollar rebuild kit. Thanks; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01096.html (12,901 bytes)
13. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: RJohn50603@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 23:58:47 -0500 (EST); Don't mince words... tell us what you really think! I still can't complain about nine years of good service from my HIF's. I only change things that don't work reliably, so far, my SU's stay. R. Joh; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01111.html (7,722 bytes)
14. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: GOFASTMG@aol.com; Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 14:58:38 -0500 (EST); << I still can't complain about nine years of good service from my HIF's. I only change things that don't work reliably, so far, my SU's stay. Ditto, I can't complain after 7 years on my HIFs, I just; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01134.html (7,912 bytes)
15. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins); Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 09:20:22 -0600 (CST); My HIFs have been stellar ever since I got the car (4 years ago). I'm beginning to think that the HIFs are much more stable over the long term than the HSs. Makes sense to me, what with all of those; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01171.html (7,978 bytes)
16. Re: S.U.s or Webers (score: 1): Author: "Bill Lattimer" <m22@skypoint.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 19:22:45 -0600; It really depends on what you're looking for. My TWM manifold and sidedraft 45 DCOE provides MUCH better throttle response than my SUs ever did. The SUs were fine, but the car didn't have the neck sn; /html/mgs/1997-01/msg01211.html (9,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]