Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rubber\s+Bumper\s+B\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Rubber\s+Bumper\s+B\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:08:31 +1030; I forgot toi mention the fun part of last year's 9 hour road trip. I also managed to carry with me two 20 litre jerry cans of AVGAS (one in the boot and one on the passenger seat floor - I wouldn't b; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00432.html (8,976 bytes)
22. Re: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:50:44 -0000; Any MGB would be just the ticket - but it would have to be to UK spec ... have traffic. /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00471.html (8,640 bytes)
23. Re: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: Zubrovka <zubrovka@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:54:49 -0500; Asthetically, the chrome bumper B looks better to me, but I was wondering what happens to a chrome bumper B in a BUMP versus the RBB? Would the car sustain more damage in a collision than a RBB? Are; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00481.html (8,126 bytes)
24. Re: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:24:43 -0600; Well, not neccessarily. You lower it and you will be under the bumper of just about every truck out there, and many cars. The rubber bumpers are 5 mph bumpers. The chrome would say 2 1/2 mph, I belie; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00482.html (9,179 bytes)
25. RE: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:44:52 -0800; I don't have any structural engineering specs on the cars, so my comments are opinions not fact. In parking lots with speeds < 5mph the rubber bumpers are going to survive without damage. That's wha; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00483.html (10,209 bytes)
26. Re: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:31:01 -0800; Very good points, Kelvin. On the subject of seat belts, I was wondering if anyone could testify to a successful retrofit of 3-point belts to a Mk. I roadster, without going to modern seats or adding; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00486.html (10,924 bytes)
27. RE: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:03:28 -0800; I was interested to hear that someone was using structural adhesives to glue new floors into his MGB. Which made me think (I know, scary). Why not glue the seat belt mounting reinforcement plate int; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00489.html (9,850 bytes)
28. Re: Rubber Bumper B (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:34:21 -0800; Hmmm. Maybe I can check that out at the next show. ... MGs at Jack London Square is coming up. Thanks. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with ch; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00491.html (8,598 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 28
Page: [1] [2]