Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+Newsgroup\s+Is\s+a\s+Good\s+Newsgroup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+Newsgroup\s+Is\s+a\s+Good\s+Newsgroup\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. No Newsgroup Is a Good Newsgroup (score: 1): Author: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 08:55:23 -0800; Greetings all, Well, it seems the consensus is against the formation of an MGs Usenet group. I will certainly abide by the will of the list. Everyone responding had a valid point, and I can see the c; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg02146.html (7,182 bytes)
2. Re: No Newsgroup Is a Good Newsgroup (score: 1): Author: "Kai Radicke" <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 16:16:46 -0500; Spammers a concern? Not really anymore... the only major concern I have when I post to UseNet is those pesky little bots might grab my email address and put it in a list with 50million other address; /html/mgs/1998-01/msg02159.html (8,164 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]