Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Never\s+under\s+estimate\s+your\s+DPO\.\s+$If\s+you\s+had\s+one\.\.\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Never\s+under\s+estimate\s+your\s+DPO\.\s+$If\s+you\s+had\s+one\.\.\.$\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:27:20 -0600; Of the many things my DPO screwed up on my car, this is one of the better (worse?) ones. I was replacing my worn out hubs today. I got back to the 4th wheel (right rear) last. When I went to pull out; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00487.html (9,171 bytes)
2. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:32:54 +0100; Not quite sure what the meaning of your 'not too surprising' is but the front hub nuts are supposed to be torqued to between 40 and 70 ft lbs. The wide 'tolerance' is to allow one of the split pin ho; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00495.html (8,584 bytes)
3. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 07:54:12 -0500; Reading your Re-line reminded me that some days I am my own DPO! :-P rick /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00499.html (7,913 bytes)
4. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:15:50 -0600; Not too surprising for my DPO. When I find things that are just stupid, I am no longer too surprised by them. I no longer remember all the stupid things I have corrected on my car. Looking at the hub; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00502.html (8,682 bytes)
5. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: "Bill Meyer" <wcameyer@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:39:22 -0700; Amen, Rick Bill /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00505.html (7,941 bytes)
6. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:58:01 -0600; I assume you guys are doing that so that you will have something to complain to the list about, or so you won't feel left out when the conversation turns this way! Thank goodness that chevette I lear; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00507.html (8,527 bytes)
7. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: Bill Dudley <wdudley4@attbi.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:43:55 -0600; That's one of the problems with being an original owner. No one else to blame! except for the dumb things the body shop did when painting my car. Bill Dudley 67 MGB Original Owner 74 1/2 MGB GT V8 pr; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00512.html (8,116 bytes)
8. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:26:27 -0500; Hi Andy, see below: I vote for "worse." It's dangerous. Believe it or not they're called "crenelations." SNIP this. Maybe it was his "mechanic." ;^) Glad you found and rectified the prob. You'll be a; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00525.html (8,989 bytes)
9. Re: Never under estimate your DPO. (If you had one...) (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:39:02 -0700; Must be a new DPO method for setting the end float :P Skye -- 1966 MGB - GHN3L Safety Fast! __,__\__ The MGB Experience www.mgbexperience.com (_o____o_) /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorco; /html/mgs/2002-09/msg00658.html (8,246 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]