Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NOS\s+\-\s+Definition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NOS\s+\-\s+Definition\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: NOS - Definition (score: 1): Author: "Kai Radicke" <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:05:12 -0400; Yes, correct. (ie. original Girling, Lucas, BL, BMC, etc items...) -- Kai Radicke -- kmr@pil.net -- 1966 MGB @ http://www.pil.net/~mowogmg IRC: irc.mcs.net, #inet-access (my nick: KMR or rebelgeek); /html/mgs/1998-04/msg00708.html (7,159 bytes)
2. Re: NOS - Definition (score: 1): Author: Carol <car@intersatx.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 14:12:15 -0700; I sure stuck my foot in my mouth... I thought it meant New Old Stock.... close... Carol; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg00709.html (7,075 bytes)
3. Re: NOS - Definition (score: 1): Author: "Kai Radicke" <mowogmg@pil.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:21:10 -0400; No, I've heard both used. Paul (my co worker) maintains the New Old Stock theory. I've gotten accustomed to saying New Original Stock. Same thing, but IMHO... just because its "new old" doesn't mean; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg00710.html (7,417 bytes)
4. RE: NOS - Definition (score: 1): Author: "Unger, Larry G" <larry.g.unger@lmco.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 15:24:14 -0400; Hmm ... I've always heard it referred to as "New Old Stock", but I've been wrong before! Safety Fast! ... larry.g.unger@lmco.com '61 MGA 1600 MkII; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg00711.html (6,929 bytes)
5. Re: NOS - Definition (score: 1): Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@iamerica.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 19:33:32 -0500; It does. John; /html/mgs/1998-04/msg00747.html (7,226 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]