Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+the\s+1965\s+MGB\s+the\s+best\s+year\s+made\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Is\s+the\s+1965\s+MGB\s+the\s+best\s+year\s+made\?\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Is the 1965 MGB the best year made? (score: 1): Author: Bob Shaw <shaws@mlcltd.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 20:48:40 -0500; I love my modified A, but the only car I've ever had sellers regret over was my '63 B. Oh how I wish I's kept that car! -- Bob Shaw Check out Shaw's Garage at http://www.mlcltd.com/shawsgarage/ My Br; /html/mgs/2001-09/msg00559.html (9,071 bytes)
22. Re: Is the 1965 MGB the best year made? (score: 1): Author: "Bob D." <bobmgtd@home.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 22:13:54 -0500; Are the 3 main engines peppier than the early (non-smog) 5 main ones? Somewhere I heard that the extra main bearings actually add enough friction to make a noticeable reduction in power. Bob Donahue; /html/mgs/2001-09/msg00562.html (8,099 bytes)
23. Re: Is the 1965 MGB the best year made? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:10:48 -0700; Well, according to the published HP figures that doesn't seem to be true. I think what was actually claimed is that the 3-main engine is more free-revving, due to less friction, which seems plausible; /html/mgs/2001-09/msg00565.html (8,483 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]