- 21. RE: Front wheel bearings (score: 1)
- Author: "British Sportscar Center" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:09:49 -0800
- Hmm, Ken, based on Barney's note yesterday and your comments, it seems I've been using better quality bearings than are really necessary! Let me correct my earlier assertion that all caged ball beari
- /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00511.html (9,117 bytes)
- 22. RE: Front wheel bearings (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Christian <kenc@gscutah.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:07:13 -0700
- Thanks, Lawrie. I verified what you said with my source (Moss Motors), and these bearings are not "thrust" bearings. Good to know for future reference, though! Thanks, Ken 1959 MGA (New to the 'sport
- /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00512.html (8,420 bytes)
- 23. RE: Front wheel bearings (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Morris <MGA1500@mac.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:25:46 -0500
- Let me add a couple terms here to help clarify. The caged ball bearings that have no bias as to direction of side load (and in fact will tolerate *very* little side load) are generally called radial
- /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00543.html (9,484 bytes)
- 24. RE: Front wheel bearings (score: 1)
- Author: barneymg@ntsource.com
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 09:35:28 -0600
- I second these comments, except that radial bearings often can take a fair amount of side load. Not always a lot, but considerably more than "very little". How much thrust load they can take depends
- /html/mgs/2002-03/msg00556.html (9,716 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu