Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Flames\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Flames\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Flames (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4 <WSpohn4@aol.com>; Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 11:04:37 EDT; <<This is the second flame exchange I've seen in a week on the MG list. WHAT'S THE POINT? I realize I'm the newcomer, but why don't you guys take it outside & leave the folks who are here for support; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg01381.html (6,949 bytes)
2. Re: Flames (score: 1): Author: "Jim Carney" <carney_fam_ark@email.msn.com>; Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 17:27:42 -0500; I've gotten many replies to this note, all of them positive, and I appreciate it. I think the best one was to just delete that stuff & move on. Jim is norm. they the they; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg01409.html (7,699 bytes)
3. flames (score: 1): Author: "Michael P. Ohleger" <mikeoh@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 23:27:28 -0500; I suggest to all of you that this Dan guy has set his PC to repeat this message every 3 or 4 minutes for the next six days. I've already flamed the guy...; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00684.html (6,792 bytes)
4. Re: flames (score: 1): Author: BarneyMG@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 01:04:13 -0500; He obviously set an automatic trap to respont to all his mail while he was gone. Trouble is, he's responding to the list, and he's on the list , so he keeps responding to all his own responses over t; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00751.html (6,978 bytes)
5. Re: flames (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 01:20:05 -0500; << I suggest to all of you that this Dan guy has set his PC to repeat this message every 3 or 4 minutes for the next six days. I've already flamed the guy... No, I'll bet old Dan doesn't have the fog; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00762.html (7,069 bytes)
6. Re: flames (score: 1): Author: Andrew Murdock <Andrew.Murdock@cdc.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 09:53:28 +0000; Pointless as all it will do is automatically frire a message back at you. YOu just flamed a machine.... Dan has set his mail to auto-reply to say that he is out of the office, he should have unsubscr; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00797.html (8,003 bytes)
7. Re: flames (score: 1): Author: car@texas.net (Carol); Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 05:53:22 -0600 (CST); AMEN, Terry!! Carol (sending Dan a "sympathy card" via e-mail) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "As you approach life's curves, never brake and always leave skid marks!"; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00803.html (7,520 bytes)
8. Re: flames (score: 1): Author: "Frank Sperling III" <sperling@hooked.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 08:12:44 -0800; I'm sure it's an honest mistake that Dan made (albeit really annoying...is there a British slang word that we could use here?) Dan set up a rule in his e-mail program to respond "I will be out..." to; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00820.html (8,291 bytes)
9. Re: flames (score: 1): Author: Geoff Love <engconn@pottsville.infi.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 14:21:40 -0500; As a complete novice to this computer/internet thing, isn't it a waste of time sending messages back to him if he is going to be out of the office until the 11th.??? Perhaps if anyone knows him perso; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00828.html (7,325 bytes)
10. Re: flames (score: 1): Author: OSCALETA99@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 02:05:58 -0500; Im a bit late on the Dan Hughes thing too however having deleted about 200 of his, itoo was tempeted to suggest the medieval crime discussed a while back but then in all fairness, i seem to recall hi; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg00898.html (7,017 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]