- 1. C reviews, why bad?/ was Engine weights... (score: 1)
- Author: The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 10:48:25 -0500
- Probably it was preconceptions. Most all the automotive press saw the main deficiency of the B as a lack of horsepower. They probably anticipated the C as simply a B with more umph. Well, it had more
- /html/mgs/1997-09/msg01904.html (8,072 bytes)
- 2. C reviews, why bad?/ was Engine weights... (score: 1)
- Author: David Knowles <dknowles@uk.b-r.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 15:04:00 +0100
- Previously, on this channel..... pissed off car. I reviews Probably it was preconceptions. Most all the automotive press saw the main deficiency of the B as a lack of horsepower. They probably antici
- /html/mgs/1997-09/msg02036.html (10,827 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu